From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACFBC3567B for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DA020828 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727299AbgBXJwa (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 04:52:30 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:49216 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726765AbgBXJwa (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 04:52:30 -0500 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1j6APb-0007Fy-EJ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:52:27 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:52:27 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: zanussi@kernel.org Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 21/25] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function Message-ID: <20200224095227.kfzl2lhonpmderlj@linutronix.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-02-21 15:24:49 [-0600], zanussi@kernel.org wrote: > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch. > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. This alone makes no sense. I had this in the devel tree as part of a three patch series to remove a limitation in on_each_cpu_cond_mask(). This does not apply to the v4.14 series due to lack of the on_each_cpu_cond_mask() function. Sebastian