From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88294C35671 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691D42072D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727448AbgBXMZR (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 07:25:17 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:48310 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727290AbgBXMZQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 07:25:16 -0500 Received: from ip5f5bf7ec.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.91.247.236] helo=wittgenstein) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6CnI-0002AG-1u; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:25:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:25:03 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Colin King , Christian Brauner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] clone3: fix an unsigned args.cgroup comparison to less than zero Message-ID: <20200224122503.2m4oc5wgg2oqpjsi@wittgenstein> References: <20200222001513.43099-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20200222121801.cu4dfnk4z5xd5uc2@wittgenstein> <20200224073157.GB3286@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200224073157.GB3286@kadam> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:31:57AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:15:13AM +0000, Colin King wrote: > > > From: Colin Ian King > > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c > > index 2diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c > > index 2853e258fe1f..dca4dde3b5b2 100644 > > --- a/kernel/fork.c > > +++ b/kernel/fork.c > > @@ -2618,7 +2618,8 @@ noinline static int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs, > > !valid_signal(args.exit_signal))) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - if ((args.flags & CLONE_INTO_CGROUP) && args.cgroup < 0) > > + if ((args.flags & CLONE_INTO_CGROUP) && > > + (args.cgroup > INT_MAX || (s64)args.cgroup < 0)) > > If we're capping it at INT_MAX then the check for negative isn't > required and static analysis tools know it's not so they might complain. It isn't, but it's easier to understand for the reader. But I don't care that much and if it's trouble for tools than fine. Christian