From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:46:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228094626.GN14946@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228093604.GH18400@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:36:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +
> + /*
> + * Flip an active event to a new master; this is tricky because
> + * for an active event event_pmu_read() can be called at any
> + * time from NMI context.
> + *
> + * This means we need to have ->dup_master and
> + * ->dup_count consistent at all times. Of course we cannot do
> + * two writes at once :/
> + *
> + * Instead, flip ->dup_master to EVENT_TOMBSTONE, this will
> + * make event_pmu_read_dup() NOP. Then we can set
> + * ->dup_count and finally set ->dup_master to the new_master
> + * to let event_pmu_read_dup() rip.
> + */
> + WRITE_ONCE(tmp->dup_master, EVENT_TOMBSTONE);
> + barrier();
> +
> + count = local64_read(&new_master->count);
> + local64_set(&tmp->dup_count, count);
> +
> + if (tmp == new_master)
> + local64_set(&tmp->master_count, count);
> +
> + barrier();
> + WRITE_ONCE(tmp->dup_master, new_master);
> dup_count++;
> @@ -4453,12 +4484,14 @@ static void __perf_event_read(void *info
>
> static inline u64 perf_event_count(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> - if (event->dup_master == event) {
> - return local64_read(&event->master_count) +
> - atomic64_read(&event->master_child_count);
> - }
> + u64 count;
>
> - return local64_read(&event->count) + atomic64_read(&event->child_count);
> + if (likely(event->dup_master != event))
> + count = local64_read(&event->count);
> + else
> + count = local64_read(&event->master_count);
> +
> + return count + atomic64_read(&event->child_count);
> }
>
> /*
One thing that I've failed to mention so far (but has sorta been implied
if you thought carefully) is that ->dup_master and ->master_count also
need to be consistent at all times. Even !ACTIVE events can have
perf_event_count() called on them.
Worse; I just realize that perf_event_count() is called remotely, so we
need SMP ordering between reading ->dup_master and ->master_count
*groan*....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-28 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-23 8:31 Song Liu
2020-02-07 20:03 ` Song Liu
2020-02-28 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-28 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
[not found] ` <22C4E3F7-E367-4305-A40E-C39A8E46C1B9@fb.com>
2020-03-04 21:58 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200228094626.GN14946@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®