From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C64BC3F2C6 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B2620838 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uOrQHyef" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728729AbgCCKcs (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:32:48 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:53605 "EHLO mail-pj1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728684AbgCCKcr (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:32:47 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id cx7so1155986pjb.3 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:32:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oqQPvVpfCUeuYgBc2cgqqSfJNV0Jwct5hvRDfltneII=; b=uOrQHyeflwKQT2FWHpxmjqSxCOzUmM45BmOkyKkyM+m949DMLrLgz7CIeoKNISLuHa A88/FDlDWEx3K8HYzjdaDG8d4Q7TzVg0JJLV1tuLyTMcNNTqZTeN1xMiMNsr8OSTfa9n wCyS1n/AZlBdk0604zASV9f+vApcy5ukQPa6LLdLky59QewxFdsqngfnw8dY3HzYzYgV jPSuQkfNe7ZhQaCjAs8CrhCZZRxiucfr2Y2xLqJh0vk8msQcDvxMeYp8cHph+XQfDWRa gdSph83HAbyQPFvgVmjvt4fcZHOltfUTiQJuQV6uq0Gj/ncV6RkJTAzledd0HIIor6ZM ilYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oqQPvVpfCUeuYgBc2cgqqSfJNV0Jwct5hvRDfltneII=; b=W1pvFRkAus3redss6eIqv36YgL7ljDYwwX5kJdpqp93npFd/SLpsgpq5J7sl2eMi99 T/UMpnJTaT0ifXHrPKGeTFbc2vuJFL3n9yN3sVnvKu46iawviS775lwSrm7zcIxf4kys rTjxqoyhnotckTHMQ7aBng6aCWTE5HpMYfhw/nZ+cqPweVrmJrLbCknV1x9GDKutlyPU FG3cU3PkH0bFvCLNzF/Ay7ZSXxZAx9V1RHTM5/iVo/tn2pnyPnw6+KjC1Vv/tyniiiH2 hCqLXXlz8mL3j6C3yg9UFxeijS0PB3fF8GWdz5CfPrdEICMKy1Y3wKET0G0pQoDl9qnu HaXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1ERZtW/wCTur9CGPLF3Ero2gqT3S449N0Vq1XhU3jqxWyhdj1A dVUU0bpBW363x7KW3uX7ktI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuJLDKMo8iW2axGmY/AV069rKY9kUI27RvXIT424nsV8Qettivq8YPMAynSs9RftoCSBg9cOg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3011:: with SMTP id hg17mr3328720pjb.90.1583231566109; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:32:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (167.117.30.125.dy.iij4u.or.jp. [125.30.117.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k70sm2266347pje.38.2020.03.03.02.32.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:32:45 -0800 (PST) From: Sergey Senozhatsky X-Google-Original-From: Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 19:32:42 +0900 To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Andy Shevchenko , Steven Rostedt , Rasmus Villemoes , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Ilya Dryomov , Kees Cook , "Tobin C . Harding" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing Message-ID: <20200303103242.GC904@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <20200227130123.32442-1-pmladek@suse.com> <20200303072456.GA904@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20200303092255.c4j7q2r734t5upvz@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200303092255.c4j7q2r734t5upvz@pathway.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (20/03/03 10:22), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Tue 2020-03-03 16:24:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > On (20/02/27 14:01), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > > > The discussion about hashing NULL pointer value[1] uncovered that > > > the basic tests of pointer formatting do not follow the original > > > structure and cause confusion. > > > > FWIW, overall looks good to me. > > Could I add Acked-by or Reviewed-by tag, please? Sure Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky -ss