From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pinning down a blocked task to extract diagnostics
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:07:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305080755.GS2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305005049.GA21120@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:50:49PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Suppose that I need to extract diagnostics information from a blocked
> task, but that I absolutely cannot tolerate this task awakening in the
> midst of this extraction process. Is the following code the right way
> to make this work given a task "t"?
>
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
> if (t->on_rq) {
> /* Task no longer blocked, so ignore it. */
> } else {
> /* Extract consistent diagnostic information. */
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
>
> It looks like all the wakeup paths acquire ->pi_lock, but I figured I
> should actually ask...
Close, the thing pi_lock actually guards is the t->state transition *to*
TASK_WAKING/TASK_RUNNING, so something like this:
raw_spin_lock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
switch (t->state) {
case TASK_RUNNING:
case TASK_WAKING:
/* ignore */
break;
default:
/* Extract consistent diagnostic information. */
break;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
ought to work. But if you're going to do this, please add a reference to
that code in a comment on top of try_to_wake_up(), such that we can
later find all the code that relies on this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 0:50 Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-05 3:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 4:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-05 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-03-05 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-05 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 14:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-05 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 15:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-06 1:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-06 16:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-06 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305080755.GS2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®