mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pinning down a blocked task to extract diagnostics
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:07:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305080755.GS2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305005049.GA21120@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:50:49PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Suppose that I need to extract diagnostics information from a blocked
> task, but that I absolutely cannot tolerate this task awakening in the
> midst of this extraction process.  Is the following code the right way
> to make this work given a task "t"?
> 
> 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
> 	if (t->on_rq) {
> 		/* Task no longer blocked, so ignore it. */
> 	} else {
> 		/* Extract consistent diagnostic information. */
> 	}
> 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
> 
> It looks like all the wakeup paths acquire ->pi_lock, but I figured I
> should actually ask...

Close, the thing pi_lock actually guards is the t->state transition *to*
TASK_WAKING/TASK_RUNNING, so something like this:

	raw_spin_lock_irq(&t->pi_lock);
	switch (t->state) {
	case TASK_RUNNING:
	case TASK_WAKING:
		/* ignore */
		break;

	default:
		/* Extract consistent diagnostic information. */
		break;
	}
	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&t->pi_lock);

ought to work. But if you're going to do this, please add a reference to
that code in a comment on top of try_to_wake_up(), such that we can
later find all the code that relies on this.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  0:50 Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-05  3:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05  4:25   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-05  8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-03-05  8:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-05 14:01     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 14:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-05 14:28       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 15:36         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-06  1:40           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-06 16:56             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-06 21:01               ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200305080755.GS2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®