mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] sched/rt: Fix pushing unfit tasks to a better CPU
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:00:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311100020.63bb81e5@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302132721.8353-7-qais.yousef@arm.com>

On Mon,  2 Mar 2020 13:27:21 +0000
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> wrote:

> +			 * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
> +			 * not running a lower priority task.
> +			 */
> +			if (p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr) {
> +
> +				cpu = target;
> +
> +			} else if (p->prio == cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr) {
> +
> +				/*
> +				 * If the priority is the same and the new CPU
> +				 * is a better fit, then move, otherwise don't
> +				 * bother here either.
> +				 */
> +				if (fit_target)
> +					cpu = target;
> +			}

BTW, A little better algorithm would be to test fit_target first:

	target_prio = cpu_rq(target)->rt.hightest_prio.curr;
	if (p->prio < target_prio) {
		cpu = target;

	} else if (fit_target && p->prio == target_prio) {
		cpu = target;
	}

Which can also just be a single if statement:

	if (p->prio < target_prio ||
	    (fit_target && p->prio == target_prio)
		cpu = target;

-- Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02 13:27 [PATCH v3 0/6] RT Capacity Awareness Fixes & Improvements Qais Yousef
2020-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] sched/rt: cpupri_find: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case Qais Yousef
     [not found]   ` <20200304143200.GA13200@geo.homenetwork>
2020-03-04 15:18     ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-04 16:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-04 17:39     ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-04 18:54       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-04 20:01         ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-05 12:43           ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-10 14:22             ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-11 13:51               ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-20 12:58               ` [tip: sched/core] sched/rt: cpupri_find: Trigger a full search as fallback tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-03-06 14:42   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/rt: cpupri_find: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt Qais Yousef
2020-03-06 14:42   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt() tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_find on non-heterogenous systems Qais Yousef
2020-03-06 14:42   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_find() " tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: Allow pulling unfitting task Qais Yousef
     [not found]   ` <20200304145219.GA14173@geo.homenetwork>
2020-03-04 15:28     ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-06 14:42   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched/rt: Remove unnecessary push for unfit tasks Qais Yousef
2020-03-06 14:42   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef
2020-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] sched/rt: Fix pushing unfit tasks to a better CPU Qais Yousef
2020-03-06 17:51   ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-11 10:53     ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-03-11 14:11       ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-11 14:00   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-03-11 14:23     ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200311100020.63bb81e5@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®