From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33047C0044D for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C1E2074B for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:56:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583967397; bh=0hcCwLr76Y1HrvSf0R8uI0eUyHi0rxL8GhpK18dgQEo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=a4MLGrS3aEed1mpZHT1Ca70FVchYMIUF2a8Kw4qm95EhxZy+uw1f9nw01qEVWDotW io9eznlolZ4LvM/e6Fv4JN5eQBA5WRAhqcAF2URxlnfcF3M08QxAooPhA5ZZ/qcl1Q XwfhB9pZKbi+6PVHM+D80DH8EUKpsunEAGoqG9DA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731442AbgCKW4g (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:56:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57364 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731369AbgCKW4f (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:56:35 -0400 Received: from kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN (unknown [163.114.132.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7C8520749; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:56:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583967395; bh=0hcCwLr76Y1HrvSf0R8uI0eUyHi0rxL8GhpK18dgQEo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tPnsfiDyJsW5WEF+WkzlAvGp57GzDEn/TDYqZBZ3gTLb/qSlNOHKYVHPzTPMBApJ/ QZa0LyrM9NUFT47l7Q6v/KzMMSW2s+mZuWYC2TINpdwWT1HAN75hWY4PtQ3DjL3SS4 YSebbhUJmj8KOx68C1iWfC9FpGM/2ZutN18Vx4v4= Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:56:32 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Michal Kubecek Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , John Linville , Johannes Berg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/15] ethtool: set netdev features with FEATURES_SET request Message-ID: <20200311155632.4521c71b@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN> In-Reply-To: <4fda0f27da984254c3df3c9e58751134967036c9.1583962006.git.mkubecek@suse.cz> References: <4fda0f27da984254c3df3c9e58751134967036c9.1583962006.git.mkubecek@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:40:28 +0100 (CET) Michal Kubecek wrote: > + if (!(req_info.flags & ETHTOOL_FLAG_OMIT_REPLY)) { > + bool compact = req_info.flags & ETHTOOL_FLAG_COMPACT_BITSETS; is req_info->flags validated anywhere to make sure users get an error when they set a bit unrecognized by the kernel? :S