From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/cpuset: distribute tasks within affinity masks
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:24:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317192401.GE20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311140533.pclgecwhbpqzyrks@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:05:33PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 03/10/20 18:01, Josh Don wrote:
> > From: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
> >
> > Currently, when updating the affinity of tasks via either cpusets.cpus,
> > or, sched_setaffinity(); tasks not currently running within the newly
> > specified mask will be arbitrarily assigned to the first CPU within the
> > mask.
> >
> > This (particularly in the case that we are restricting masks) can
> > result in many tasks being assigned to the first CPUs of their new
> > masks.
> >
> > This:
> > 1) Can induce scheduling delays while the load-balancer has a chance to
> > spread them between their new CPUs.
> > 2) Can antogonize a poor load-balancer behavior where it has a
> > difficult time recognizing that a cross-socket imbalance has been
> > forced by an affinity mask.
> >
> > This change adds a new cpumask interface to allow iterated calls to
> > distribute within the intersection of the provided masks.
> >
> > The cases that this mainly affects are:
> > - modifying cpuset.cpus
> > - when tasks join a cpuset
> > - when modifying a task's affinity via sched_setaffinity(2)
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
> Anyway, for the API.
>
> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Thanks guys!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-17 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-11 1:01 Josh Don
2020-03-11 14:05 ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-17 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-03-17 21:35 ` Josh Don
2020-03-18 11:34 ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-19 22:45 ` Josh Don
2020-03-20 11:28 ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-20 12:58 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/core: Distribute " tip-bot2 for Paul Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200317192401.GE20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®