mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Add blurb to CPUID tracepoint when using max basic leaf values
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:53:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317195354.28384-3-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317195354.28384-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

Tack on "used max basic" at the end of the CPUID tracepoint when the
output values correspond to the max basic leaf, i.e. when emulating
Intel's out-of-range CPUID behavior.  Observing "cpuid entry not found"
in the tracepoint with non-zero output values is confusing for users
that aren't familiar with the out-of-range semantics, and qualifying the
"not found" case hopefully makes it clear that "found" means "found the
exact entry".

Suggested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c |  9 ++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 11 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index bccaae0df668..a515a83c6f29 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -990,13 +990,15 @@ bool kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
 {
 	u32 orig_function = *eax, function = *eax, index = *ecx;
 	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
-	bool exact;
+	bool exact, used_max_basic = false;
 
 	entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, index);
 	exact = !!entry;
 
-	if (!entry && !exact_only)
+	if (!entry && !exact_only) {
 		entry = get_out_of_range_cpuid_entry(vcpu, &function, index);
+		used_max_basic = !!entry;
+	}
 
 	if (entry) {
 		*eax = entry->eax;
@@ -1026,7 +1028,8 @@ bool kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	trace_kvm_cpuid(orig_function, index, *eax, *ebx, *ecx, *edx, exact);
+	trace_kvm_cpuid(orig_function, index, *eax, *ebx, *ecx, *edx, exact,
+			used_max_basic);
 	return exact;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_cpuid);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
index 27270ba0f05f..c3d1e9f4a2c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_fast_mmio,
 TRACE_EVENT(kvm_cpuid,
 	TP_PROTO(unsigned int function, unsigned int index, unsigned long rax,
 		 unsigned long rbx, unsigned long rcx, unsigned long rdx,
-		 bool found),
-	TP_ARGS(function, index, rax, rbx, rcx, rdx, found),
+		 bool found, bool used_max_basic),
+	TP_ARGS(function, index, rax, rbx, rcx, rdx, found, used_max_basic),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__field(	unsigned int,	function	)
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_cpuid,
 		__field(	unsigned long,	rcx		)
 		__field(	unsigned long,	rdx		)
 		__field(	bool,		found		)
+		__field(	bool,		used_max_basic	)
 	),
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
@@ -174,12 +175,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_cpuid,
 		__entry->rcx		= rcx;
 		__entry->rdx		= rdx;
 		__entry->found		= found;
+		__entry->used_max_basic	= used_max_basic;
 	),
 
-	TP_printk("func %x idx %x rax %lx rbx %lx rcx %lx rdx %lx, cpuid entry %s",
+	TP_printk("func %x idx %x rax %lx rbx %lx rcx %lx rdx %lx, cpuid entry %s%s",
 		  __entry->function, __entry->index, __entry->rax,
 		  __entry->rbx, __entry->rcx, __entry->rdx,
-		  __entry->found ? "found" : "not found")
+		  __entry->found ? "found" : "not found",
+		  __entry->used_max_basic ? ", used max basic" : "")
 );
 
 #define AREG(x) { APIC_##x, "APIC_" #x }
-- 
2.24.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-17 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-17 19:53 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: CPUID tracepoint enhancements Sean Christopherson
2020-03-17 19:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Add requested index to the CPUID tracepoint Sean Christopherson
2020-03-17 19:53 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: CPUID tracepoint enhancements Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200317195354.28384-3-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®