From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C51C1975A for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 21:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF8720714 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 21:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="LjpQr+Gl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726893AbgCQVbK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:31:10 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:40906 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726494AbgCQVbJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:31:09 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0C960029779DE4AAC583E4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:9600:2977:9de4:aac5:83e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 58AE31EC0C68; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:31:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1584480668; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=RMKAealFBjjSPHlKH7zxedK6Vy5tkttV34MQFS3HmiQ=; b=LjpQr+GlX3iH9rEkBWb84N4Q1ycXhEIq9TvynjyGe4TTrcJjq+Fn4WVqy1q6xvjSVFjVR5 QLXkqznZ/G8JHEBkbIojedr2YcdSwmzZdn/FjtptrhJZyyAdnmnnK/8ZMln+7fi4kGNysY VZaz4YQQKq3EP6FINuFyeolQaLrbBug= Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:31:14 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dave Hansen Cc: lkml , "Schofield, Alison" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tom Lendacky , "Shutemov, Kirill" Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted" Message-ID: <20200317213100.GH15609@zn.tnic> References: <20200317111822.GA15609@zn.tnic> <2cb4a8ae-3b13-67bd-c021-aee47fdf58c5@intel.com> <20200317210602.GG15609@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:24:59PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > No, there are just two states. I just think the "!encrypted" case > should not be called "decrypted". Yeah, we suck at naming - news at 11! :-) I believe we even considered things like "encrypted" vs "clear" but that sucked too. ;-\ In any case, that ship has sailed now and having two as differently as possible looking words to denote the two "states" should be good enough for our purposes... Oh well. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette