From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com, pavel.gerasimov@intel.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 05/17] perf machine: Remove the indent in resolve_lbr_callchain_sample
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:50:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200318195045.GT11531@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200313183319.17739-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Em Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:33:07AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The indent is unnecessary in resolve_lbr_callchain_sample.
> Removing it will make the following patch simpler.
>
> Current code path for resolve_lbr_callchain_sample()
>
> /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> if (i != chain_nr) {
> body of the function
> ....
> return 1;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> With the patch,
>
> /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> if (i == chain_nr)
> return 0;
>
> body of the function
> ...
> return 1;
>
> No functional changes.
Thanks for doing this,
- Arnaldo
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/machine.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index fd14f1489802..9021e5b6a2a9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -2177,6 +2177,12 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
> int chain_nr = min(max_stack, (int)chain->nr), i;
> u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> u64 ip, branch_from = 0;
> + struct branch_stack *lbr_stack;
> + struct branch_entry *entries;
> + int lbr_nr, j, k;
> + bool branch;
> + struct branch_flags *flags;
> + int mix_chain_nr;
>
> for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) {
> if (chain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
> @@ -2184,71 +2190,68 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
> }
>
> /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> - if (i != chain_nr) {
> - struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> - int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr, j, k;
> - bool branch;
> - struct branch_flags *flags;
> - /*
> - * LBR callstack can only get user call chain.
> - * The mix_chain_nr is kernel call chain
> - * number plus LBR user call chain number.
> - * i is kernel call chain number,
> - * 1 is PERF_CONTEXT_USER,
> - * lbr_nr + 1 is the user call chain number.
> - * For details, please refer to the comments
> - * in callchain__printf
> - */
> - int mix_chain_nr = i + 1 + lbr_nr + 1;
> -
> - for (j = 0; j < mix_chain_nr; j++) {
> - int err;
> - branch = false;
> - flags = NULL;
> + if (i == chain_nr)
> + return 0;
>
> - if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
> - if (j < i + 1)
> - ip = chain->ips[j];
> - else if (j > i + 1) {
> - k = j - i - 2;
> - ip = entries[k].from;
> - branch = true;
> - flags = &entries[k].flags;
> - } else {
> - ip = entries[0].to;
> - branch = true;
> - flags = &entries[0].flags;
> - branch_from = entries[0].from;
> - }
> + lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
> + entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> + lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr;
> + /*
> + * LBR callstack can only get user call chain.
> + * The mix_chain_nr is kernel call chain
> + * number plus LBR user call chain number.
> + * i is kernel call chain number,
> + * 1 is PERF_CONTEXT_USER,
> + * lbr_nr + 1 is the user call chain number.
> + * For details, please refer to the comments
> + * in callchain__printf
> + */
> + mix_chain_nr = i + 1 + lbr_nr + 1;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < mix_chain_nr; j++) {
> + int err;
> +
> + branch = false;
> + flags = NULL;
> +
> + if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
> + if (j < i + 1)
> + ip = chain->ips[j];
> + else if (j > i + 1) {
> + k = j - i - 2;
> + ip = entries[k].from;
> + branch = true;
> + flags = &entries[k].flags;
> } else {
> - if (j < lbr_nr) {
> - k = lbr_nr - j - 1;
> - ip = entries[k].from;
> - branch = true;
> - flags = &entries[k].flags;
> - }
> - else if (j > lbr_nr)
> - ip = chain->ips[i + 1 - (j - lbr_nr)];
> - else {
> - ip = entries[0].to;
> - branch = true;
> - flags = &entries[0].flags;
> - branch_from = entries[0].from;
> - }
> + ip = entries[0].to;
> + branch = true;
> + flags = &entries[0].flags;
> + branch_from = entries[0].from;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (j < lbr_nr) {
> + k = lbr_nr - j - 1;
> + ip = entries[k].from;
> + branch = true;
> + flags = &entries[k].flags;
> + } else if (j > lbr_nr)
> + ip = chain->ips[i + 1 - (j - lbr_nr)];
> + else {
> + ip = entries[0].to;
> + branch = true;
> + flags = &entries[0].flags;
> + branch_from = entries[0].from;
> }
> -
> - err = add_callchain_ip(thread, cursor, parent,
> - root_al, &cpumode, ip,
> - branch, flags, NULL,
> - branch_from);
> - if (err)
> - return (err < 0) ? err : 0;
> }
> - return 1;
> - }
>
> - return 0;
> + err = add_callchain_ip(thread, cursor, parent,
> + root_al, &cpumode, ip,
> + branch, flags, NULL,
> + branch_from);
> + if (err)
> + return (err < 0) ? err : 0;
> + }
> + return 1;
> }
>
> static int find_prev_cpumode(struct ip_callchain *chain, struct thread *thread,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-13 18:33 [PATCH V3 00/17] Stitch LBR call stack (Perf Tools) kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 01/17] perf pmu: Add support for PMU capabilities kan.liang
2020-03-18 19:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-19 13:07 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 02/17] perf header: Support CPU " kan.liang
2020-03-18 19:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 03/17] perf record: Clear HEADER_CPU_PMU_CAPS for non LBR call stack mode kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 04/17] perf stat: Clear HEADER_CPU_PMU_CAPS kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 05/17] perf machine: Remove the indent in resolve_lbr_callchain_sample kan.liang
2020-03-18 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 06/17] perf machine: Refine the function for LBR call stack reconstruction kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 07/17] perf machine: Factor out lbr_callchain_add_kernel_ip() kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 08/17] perf machine: Factor out lbr_callchain_add_lbr_ip() kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 09/17] perf thread: Add a knob for LBR stitch approach kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 10/17] perf tools: Save previous sample for LBR stitching approach kan.liang
2020-03-18 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-18 14:20 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 11/17] perf tools: Save previous cursor nodes " kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 12/17] perf tools: Stitch LBR call stack kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 13/17] perf report: Add option to enable the LBR stitching approach kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 14/17] perf script: " kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 15/17] perf top: " kan.liang
2020-03-18 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-18 14:19 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 16/17] perf c2c: " kan.liang
2020-03-13 18:33 ` [PATCH V3 17/17] perf hist: Add fast path for duplicate entries check kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200318195045.GT11531@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel.gerasimov@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome