From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
hpa@zytor.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/8] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:18:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324151859.31068-7-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324151859.31068-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Emulate MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES in software and unconditionally
advertise its support to userspace. Like MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, it
is a feature-enumerating MSR and can be fully emulated regardless of
hardware support. Existence of CORE_CAPABILITIES is enumerated via
CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[30].
Note, support for individual features enumerated via CORE_CAPABILITIES,
e.g., split lock detection, will be added in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 9a183e9d4cb1..7e842ccb0608 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u64 ia32_xss;
u64 microcode_version;
u64 arch_capabilities;
+ u64 core_capabilities;
/*
* Paging state of the vcpu
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 435a7da07d5f..1cacc776b329 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void)
/* TSC_ADJUST and ARCH_CAPABILITIES are emulated in software. */
kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST);
kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
+ kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES);
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB) && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRS))
kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 5ef57e3a315f..fc1a4e9e5659 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ static const u32 emulated_msrs_all[] = {
MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE,
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
+ MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS,
MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL,
@@ -1314,6 +1315,7 @@ static const u32 msr_based_features_all[] = {
MSR_F10H_DECFG,
MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV,
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
+ MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
};
static u32 msr_based_features[ARRAY_SIZE(msr_based_features_all)];
@@ -1367,12 +1369,20 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
return data;
}
+static u64 kvm_get_core_capabilities(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
{
switch (msr->index) {
case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
msr->data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
+ msr->data = kvm_get_core_capabilities();
+ break;
case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
rdmsrl_safe(msr->index, &msr->data);
break;
@@ -2745,6 +2755,11 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
return 1;
vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
+ if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
+ return 1;
+ vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = data;
+ break;
case MSR_EFER:
return set_efer(vcpu, msr_info);
case MSR_K7_HWCR:
@@ -3072,6 +3087,12 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
return 1;
msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities;
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
+ if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
+ !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES))
+ return 1;
+ msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.core_capabilities;
+ break;
case MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL:
msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_power_ctl;
break;
@@ -9367,6 +9388,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto free_guest_fpu;
vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
+ vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = kvm_get_core_capabilities();
vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);
vcpu_load(vcpu);
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 15:18 [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow " Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write in emulator Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 0:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 0:31 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 0:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] kvm: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 0:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 1:11 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 1:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 1:38 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 11:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 12:31 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 6:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 12:43 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 14:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 15:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 18:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of " Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200324151859.31068-7-xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome