mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 05/22] vm86: get rid of get_user_ex() use
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 02:31:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327023205.881896-5-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327023205.881896-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Just do a copyin of what we want into a local variable and
be done with that.  We are guaranteed to be on shallow stack
here...

Note that conditional expression for range passed to access_ok()
in mainline had been pointless all along - the only difference
between vm86plus_struct and vm86_struct is that the former has
one extra field in the end and when we get to copyin of that
field (conditional upon 'plus' argument), we use copy_from_user().
Moreover, all fields starting with ->int_revectored are copied
that way, so we only need that check (be it done by access_ok()
or by user_access_begin()) only on the beginning of the structure -
the fields that used to be covered by that get_user_try() block.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
index 91d55454e702..49b37eb01e99 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *user_vm86, bool plus)
 	struct kernel_vm86_regs vm86regs;
 	struct pt_regs *regs = current_pt_regs();
 	unsigned long err = 0;
+	struct vm86_struct v;
 
 	err = security_mmap_addr(0);
 	if (err) {
@@ -278,39 +279,32 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *user_vm86, bool plus)
 	if (vm86->saved_sp0)
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if (!access_ok(user_vm86, plus ?
-		       sizeof(struct vm86_struct) :
-		       sizeof(struct vm86plus_struct)))
+	if (copy_from_user(&v, user_vm86,
+			offsetof(struct vm86_struct, int_revectored)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	memset(&vm86regs, 0, sizeof(vm86regs));
-	get_user_try {
-		unsigned short seg;
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.bx, &user_vm86->regs.ebx);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.cx, &user_vm86->regs.ecx);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.dx, &user_vm86->regs.edx);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.si, &user_vm86->regs.esi);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.di, &user_vm86->regs.edi);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.bp, &user_vm86->regs.ebp);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.ax, &user_vm86->regs.eax);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.ip, &user_vm86->regs.eip);
-		get_user_ex(seg, &user_vm86->regs.cs);
-		vm86regs.pt.cs = seg;
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.flags, &user_vm86->regs.eflags);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.pt.sp, &user_vm86->regs.esp);
-		get_user_ex(seg, &user_vm86->regs.ss);
-		vm86regs.pt.ss = seg;
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.es, &user_vm86->regs.es);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.ds, &user_vm86->regs.ds);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.fs, &user_vm86->regs.fs);
-		get_user_ex(vm86regs.gs, &user_vm86->regs.gs);
-
-		get_user_ex(vm86->flags, &user_vm86->flags);
-		get_user_ex(vm86->screen_bitmap, &user_vm86->screen_bitmap);
-		get_user_ex(vm86->cpu_type, &user_vm86->cpu_type);
-	} get_user_catch(err);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+
+	vm86regs.pt.bx = v.regs.ebx;
+	vm86regs.pt.cx = v.regs.ecx;
+	vm86regs.pt.dx = v.regs.edx;
+	vm86regs.pt.si = v.regs.esi;
+	vm86regs.pt.di = v.regs.edi;
+	vm86regs.pt.bp = v.regs.ebp;
+	vm86regs.pt.ax = v.regs.eax;
+	vm86regs.pt.ip = v.regs.eip;
+	vm86regs.pt.cs = v.regs.cs;
+	vm86regs.pt.flags = v.regs.eflags;
+	vm86regs.pt.sp = v.regs.esp;
+	vm86regs.pt.ss = v.regs.ss;
+	vm86regs.es = v.regs.es;
+	vm86regs.ds = v.regs.ds;
+	vm86regs.fs = v.regs.fs;
+	vm86regs.gs = v.regs.gs;
+
+	vm86->flags = v.flags;
+	vm86->screen_bitmap = v.screen_bitmap;
+	vm86->cpu_type = v.cpu_type;
 
 	if (copy_from_user(&vm86->int_revectored,
 			   &user_vm86->int_revectored,
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-27  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23 18:36 [RFC][PATCHSET] x86 uaccess cleanups Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/22] x86 user stack frame reads: switch to explicit __get_user() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:37   ` [RFC][PATCH 02/22] x86 kvm page table walks: " Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 03/22] x86: switch sigframe sigset handling to explict __get_user()/__put_user() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 04/22] x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 05/22] vm86: get rid of get_user_ex() use Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 06/22] x86: get rid of get_user_ex() in ia32_restore_sigcontext() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 07/22] x86: get rid of get_user_ex() in restore_sigcontext() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 08/22] x86: kill get_user_{try,catch,ex} Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 09/22] x86: switch save_v86_state() to unsafe_put_user() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 10/22] x86: switch setup_sigcontext() " Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 11/22] x86: switch ia32_setup_sigcontext() " Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 12/22] x86: get rid of put_user_try in {ia32,x32}_setup_rt_frame() Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 13/22] x86: ia32_setup_sigcontext(): lift user_access_{begin,end}() into the callers Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:53     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-23 21:42       ` Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 14/22] x86: ia32_setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 15/22] x86: ia32_setup_rt_frame(): " Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 16/22] x86: get rid of put_user_try in __setup_rt_frame() (both 32bit and 64bit) Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 17/22] x86: setup_sigcontext(): list user_access_{begin,end}() into callers Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 18/22] x86: __setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 19/22] x86: __setup_rt_frame(): " Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 20/22] x86: x32_setup_rt_frame(): " Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 21/22] x86: unsafe_put_... macros for sigcontext and sigmask Al Viro
2020-03-23 18:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 22/22] kill uaccess_try() Al Viro
2020-03-24 15:15   ` [RFC][PATCH 01/22] x86 user stack frame reads: switch to explicit __get_user() Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-28 10:48   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-03-28 11:59     ` Al Viro
2020-03-29  9:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2020-03-29 16:50         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-29 17:05           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 17:41           ` David Laight
2020-03-29 17:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 18:03               ` David Laight
2020-03-29 18:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 18:32                   ` David Laight
2020-03-29 18:55                     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 21:21                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-29 22:06                     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 22:12                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 18:16               ` Al Viro
2020-03-29 18:19                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-29 17:57         ` Al Viro
2020-03-30 15:54           ` David Laight
2020-03-23 19:16 ` [RFC][PATCHSET] x86 uaccess cleanups Linus Torvalds
2020-03-27  2:24 ` [RFC][PATCHSET v2] " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:26   ` Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:30     ` Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31       ` [RFC][PATCH v2 01/22] x86 user stack frame reads: switch to explicit __get_user() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/22] x86 kvm page table walks: " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 03/22] x86: switch sigframe sigset handling to explict __get_user()/__put_user() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 04/22] x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 06/22] x86: get rid of get_user_ex() in ia32_restore_sigcontext() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 07/22] x86: get rid of get_user_ex() in restore_sigcontext() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 08/22] x86: kill get_user_{try,catch,ex} Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 09/22] x86: switch save_v86_state() to unsafe_put_user() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 10/22] x86: switch setup_sigcontext() " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 11/22] x86: switch ia32_setup_sigcontext() " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 12/22] x86: get rid of put_user_try in {ia32,x32}_setup_rt_frame() Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 13/22] x86: ia32_setup_sigcontext(): lift user_access_{begin,end}() into the callers Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 14/22] x86: ia32_setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 15/22] x86: ia32_setup_rt_frame(): " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:31         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 16/22] x86: get rid of put_user_try in __setup_rt_frame() (both 32bit and 64bit) Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:32         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 17/22] x86: setup_sigcontext(): list user_access_{begin,end}() into callers Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:32         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 18/22] x86: __setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:32         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 19/22] x86: __setup_rt_frame(): " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:32         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 20/22] x86: x32_setup_rt_frame(): " Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:32         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 21/22] x86: unsafe_put-style macro for sigmask Al Viro
2020-03-27  2:32         ` [RFC][PATCH v2 22/22] kill uaccess_try() Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200327023205.881896-5-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome