From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4FBC43331 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AB720732 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726403AbgC1LXF (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Mar 2020 07:23:05 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:33316 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725973AbgC1LXF (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Mar 2020 07:23:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B382026E; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQgVZv6pDhUT; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (mail-essen-01.secunet.de [10.53.40.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F54201E4; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.199) by MAIL-ESSEN-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:03 +0100 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:02 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1433931801E6; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:23:02 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: YueHaibing CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xfrm: policy: Remove obsolete WARN while xfrm policy inserting Message-ID: <20200328112302.GA13121@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20200327123443.12408-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327123443.12408-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-dresden-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.199) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:34:43PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote: > Since commit 7cb8a93968e3 ("xfrm: Allow inserting policies with matching > mark and different priorities"), we allow duplicate policies with > different priority, this WARN is not needed any more. Can you please describe a bit more detailed why this warning can't trigger anymore? Thanks!