From: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkml@sdf.org
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 06/50] ubi/debug: Optimize computation of odds
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:22:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202003281643.02SGh8XV025558@sdf.org> (raw)
Not only is "prandom_u32() % d" an inefficient way to obtain
a random number, but "prandom_u32_max(d) < n" is an inefficient
way to return true with probability n/d.
Where n and d are compile-time constants, the efficient way to
do this test is "prandom_u32() < ((u64)n << 32)/d.
If n == 1 and d is not a power of 2, then 0xffffffff/d == 0x100000000/d
works just as well and avoids some 64-bit arithmetic.
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <lkml@sdf.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h | 6 +++---
fs/ubifs/debug.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h
index 118248a5d7d48..d19671c1a098c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.h
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline int ubi_dbg_is_bgt_disabled(const struct ubi_device *ubi)
static inline int ubi_dbg_is_bitflip(const struct ubi_device *ubi)
{
if (ubi->dbg.emulate_bitflips)
- return !(prandom_u32() % 200);
+ return prandom_u32() < 0xffffffff/200;
return 0;
}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline int ubi_dbg_is_bitflip(const struct ubi_device *ubi)
static inline int ubi_dbg_is_write_failure(const struct ubi_device *ubi)
{
if (ubi->dbg.emulate_io_failures)
- return !(prandom_u32() % 500);
+ return prandom_u32() < 0xffffffff/500;
return 0;
}
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int ubi_dbg_is_write_failure(const struct ubi_device *ubi)
static inline int ubi_dbg_is_erase_failure(const struct ubi_device *ubi)
{
if (ubi->dbg.emulate_io_failures)
- return !(prandom_u32() % 400);
+ return prandom_u32() < 0xffffffff/400;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/debug.c b/fs/ubifs/debug.c
index 0f5a480fe264f..3d8d8eaea6c66 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/debug.c
@@ -2444,9 +2444,10 @@ int dbg_check_nondata_nodes_order(struct ubifs_info *c, struct list_head *head)
return 0;
}
-static inline int chance(unsigned int n, unsigned int out_of)
+static bool chance(unsigned int n, unsigned int out_of)
{
- return !!((prandom_u32() % out_of) + 1 <= n);
+ /* RHS is a constant expression */
+ return prandom_u32() < ((u64)n << 32) / out_of;
}
--
2.26.0
reply other threads:[~2020-03-28 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202003281643.02SGh8XV025558@sdf.org \
--to=lkml@sdf.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®