mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Petr Štetiar" <ynezz@true.cz>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: olinuxino: add user red LED
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:26:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331082606.GD21251@meh.true.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v66+oT=qfu7oHTs3d_e2hd_8Fc_0ULhHRfMLmrdcfOoe=A@mail.gmail.com>

Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> [2020-03-31 09:19:57]:

Hi,

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:53 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:59:24PM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> > > There is a red LED marked as `GPIO_LED1` on the silkscreen and connected
> > > to PE17 by default. So lets add this missing bit in the current hardware
> > > description.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
> >
> > QUeued for 5.8, thanks!
> 
> The gpio-led binding seems to prefer "led-0" up to "led-f" (^led-[0-9a-f])
> as the child node name. This was recently brought to my attention. Do we
> want to follow suit here?

I can see following in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml:

 patternProperties:
   # The first form is preferred, but fall back to just 'led' anywhere in the
   # node name to at least catch some child nodes.
   "(^led-[0-9a-f]$|led)":

So it seems like `led-0` is indeed preferred, should I send v2 or a new patch
as a fix on top of the previous one?

-- ynezz

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25 20:59 Petr Štetiar
2020-03-30 17:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-03-31  1:19   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-03-31  8:26     ` Petr Štetiar [this message]
2020-03-31  9:00     ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200331082606.GD21251@meh.true.cz \
    --to=ynezz@true.cz \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®