From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EB7C2D0F0 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 19:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158D020719 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 19:58:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585771098; bh=2mhILg0bSugkh1BT3B2Cb/X9VgSVEXTdJSigKSRVuUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=gFzxkkAQ5xews5uOqehBDrkkBx/O2jMx1z269uzPRt2ySvK50BzFF/IRINwwC14jJ h4P9MtzOVaw8i6nftwTO2/62TcUqI3uLj/ah1YjQk4eurF6qvj9TRY/8H9ebCpxCdg hLTtjHdhcNFPUuJn7CmOrjdMNvzXl/hWCWpSfoow= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732839AbgDAT6R (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:47038 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732397AbgDAT6Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j17so1491642wru.13 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:58:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CMwC7Ow1BhaKidjzqGN+TLI1c7T2E6r0Gwj56dB3pj8=; b=hhebMX3MnvCFW3gNWgPDiwtQUzcBNR97ex07BPxJ6xnx++qF1dQS/ESToYK1Depvsj kbGf46YVbPdyNT7zOebpcr8eU5jG4t5fdVOOA5JuXlx/v4DgOk8BA1ZQ5aER1QUxejv0 Mon2e063NdWHFDRM0gDM/oTZLvyBvli69hRYe/KoEUrdDIIGqSSzMdbVFpj1/A25nMsC vqP61GDF5CTfOZ/94Q0f+xxTL2cUC6pROVzLmf+5T4Ps/jZecRQYZYsHO5EZPnghzoAQ AtuiKcHWF+bFQZaRp/dY7zke6lPQMmNw6yM6rn0cqOdHG1YcEuDi5Qv3j0c9AoENe0Th v8zg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3jvdJZBL84dIZwn6q8+XESb2rIcT8bzswxn5O/3wQTo6tBNDPA Of61yqDBy9Bq8fS4bQ6Xcg4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtzrgwB9GrelE4K+wWscH7hXAQNbr8+HwyinHoIwxKJs0vWKvLo+Cn0lq5i+PQmi5gaFFtJnA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b6a5:: with SMTP id j37mr27584519wre.412.1585771094276; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-37-188-180-223.eurotel.cz. [37.188.180.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm4324853wrk.18.2020.04.01.12.58.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:58:12 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Pavel Tatashin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, david@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org, sashal@kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: initialize deferred pages with interrupts enabled Message-ID: <20200401195812.GA22681@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20200401193238.22544-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200401193238.22544-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org btw. Cc Vlastimil On Wed 01-04-20 15:32:38, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > Initializing struct pages is a long task and keeping interrupts disabled > for the duration of this operation introduces a number of problems. > > 1. jiffies are not updated for long period of time, and thus incorrect time > is reported. See proposed solution and discussion here: > lkml/20200311123848.118638-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com > 2. It prevents farther improving deferred page initialization by allowing > inter-node multi-threading. > > We are keeping interrupts disabled to solve a rather theoretical problem > that was never observed in real world (See 3a2d7fa8a3d5). > > Lets keep interrupts enabled. In case we ever encounter a scenario where > an interrupt thread wants to allocate large amount of memory this early in > boot we can deal with that by growing zone (see deferred_grow_zone()) by > the needed amount before starting deferred_init_memmap() threads. > > Before: > [ 1.232459] node 0 initialised, 12058412 pages in 1ms > > After: > [ 1.632580] node 0 initialised, 12051227 pages in 436ms > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 3c4eb750a199..4498a13b372d 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -1792,6 +1792,13 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) > BUG_ON(pgdat->first_deferred_pfn > pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat)); > pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = ULONG_MAX; > > + /* > + * Once we unlock here, the zone cannot be grown anymore, thus if an > + * interrupt thread must allocate this early in boot, zone must be > + * pre-grown prior to start of deferred page initialization. > + */ > + pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > + > /* Only the highest zone is deferred so find it */ > for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) { > zone = pgdat->node_zones + zid; > @@ -1812,8 +1819,6 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data) > while (spfn < epfn) > nr_pages += deferred_init_maxorder(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn); > zone_empty: > - pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > - > /* Sanity check that the next zone really is unpopulated */ > WARN_ON(++zid < MAX_NR_ZONES && populated_zone(++zone)); > > @@ -1854,18 +1859,6 @@ deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order) > return false; > > pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags); > - > - /* > - * If deferred pages have been initialized while we were waiting for > - * the lock, return true, as the zone was grown. The caller will retry > - * this zone. We won't return to this function since the caller also > - * has this static branch. > - */ > - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&deferred_pages)) { > - pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags); > - return true; > - } > - > /* > * If someone grew this zone while we were waiting for spinlock, return > * true, as there might be enough pages already. > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs