From: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Fix checking of IRQ_WORK_LAZY flag set on non PREEMPT_RT
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:22:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402172248.GA12483@duo.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331163513.674653275@goodmis.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1077 bytes --]
Hi!
> 4.19.106-rt46-rc1 stable review patch.
> If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is not set, some of the checks for using
> lazy_list are not properly made as the IRQ_WORK_LAZY is not checked. There's
> two locations that need this update, so a use_lazy_list() helper function is
> added and used in both locations.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321230028.GA22058@duo.ucw.cz
> Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Looks okay to me, thank you.
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
I'm currently playing with 4.4.X branch, but I'll eventually test it.
Is it possible that 4.4.X branch needs similar patch? My code review
suggests so...
Best regards, Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-31 16:34 [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 4.19.106-rt46-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2020-03-31 16:34 ` [PATCH RT 1/3] lib/ubsan: Remove flags parameter from calls to ubsan_prologue() and ubsan_epilogue() Steven Rostedt
2020-03-31 16:34 ` [PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Fix checking of IRQ_WORK_LAZY flag set on non PREEMPT_RT Steven Rostedt
2020-04-02 17:22 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2020-04-02 17:39 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-04-03 21:55 ` Pavel Machek
2020-03-31 16:34 ` [PATCH RT 3/3] Linux 4.19.106-rt46-rc1 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402172248.GA12483@duo.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®