From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, newella@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: add request->io_data_len
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 22:11:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409021119.GJ162390@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200409014406.GA370295@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:44:06AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Almost all __blk_mq_end_request() follow blk_update_request(), so the
> completed bytes can be passed to __blk_mq_end_request(), then we can
> avoid to introduce this field.
But on some drivers blk_update_request() may be called multiple times before
__blk_mq_end_request() is called and what's needed here is the total number of
bytes in the whole request, not just in the final completion.
> Also there is just 20 callers of __blk_mq_end_request(), looks this kind
> of change shouldn't be too big.
This would work iff we get rid of partial completions and if we get rid of
partial completions, we might as well stop exposing blk_update_request() and
__blk_mq_end_request().
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-09 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 20:14 [PATCHSET block/for-5.8] iocost: improve use_delay and latency target handling Tejun Heo
2020-04-08 20:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-iocost: switch to fixed non-auto-decaying use_delay Tejun Heo
2020-04-08 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] block: add request->io_data_len Tejun Heo
2020-04-09 1:44 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-09 2:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2020-04-09 2:38 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-09 5:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-04-13 14:02 ` Tejun Heo
2020-04-13 13:56 ` Tejun Heo
2020-04-09 3:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-13 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
2020-04-08 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-iocost: account for IO size when testing latencies Tejun Heo
2020-04-08 20:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] iocost_monitor: exit successfully if interval is zero Tejun Heo
2020-04-08 20:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] iocost_monitor: drop string wrap around numbers when outputting json Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200409021119.GJ162390@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=newella@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®