From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=VV4q=52=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B8EC2BB86
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:56:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E874420769
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726706AbgDJL4L (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 10 Apr 2020 07:56:11 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:54448 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1725913AbgDJL4K (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 10 Apr 2020 07:56:10 -0400
Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de)
        by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
        (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <tglx@linutronix.de>)
        id 1jMsGO-0004bg-2S; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:56:00 +0200
Received: from nanos.tec.linutronix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1])
        by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744F3100BB6;
        Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:55:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20200410115359.242241855@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
Date:   Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:53:59 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 0/3] x86/kvm: Basic split lock #AC handling
Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

This is a reworked version of the patches posted by Sean:

 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200402155554.27705-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com

The changes vs. this are:

    1) Use a separate function for guest split lock handling

    2) Force SIGBUS when SLD mode fatal

    3) Rename the misnomed helper function which decides whether
       #AC is injected into the guest or not and move the feature
       check and the comments into that helper.

Thanks,

	tglx