From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"open list:FILESYSTEM DIRECT ACCESS (DAX)"
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:FILESYSTEM DIRECT ACCESS (DAX)"
<linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dax: Add missing annotation for wait_entry_unlocked()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415104223.GB6126@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401153400.23610-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
On Wed 01-04-20 16:33:59, Jules Irenge wrote:
> Sparse reports a warning at wait_entry_unlocked()
>
> warning: context imbalance in wait_entry_unlocked() - unexpected unlock
>
> The root cause is the missing annotation at wait_entry_unlocked()
> Add the missing __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock) annotation
>
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 35da144375a0..ee0468af4d81 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned int order)
> * After we call xas_unlock_irq(), we cannot touch xas->xa.
> */
> static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
> + __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock)
> {
> struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
> wait_queue_head_t *wq;
> --
> Change since v2
> - gives more accurate lock variable name
> 2.25.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-01 15:33 Jules Irenge
2020-04-15 10:42 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200415104223.GB6126@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jbi.octave@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®