From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524E5C2BA19 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EF120784 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2410830AbgDORUS (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:20:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33876 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2410819AbgDORUN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:20:13 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC3712076D; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:20:11 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rasmus Villemoes , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] lib/vsprintf: Introduce %ptT for time64_t Message-ID: <20200415132011.624f35f6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200415170046.33374-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20200415170046.33374-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:43 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time. > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it. > > Andrew, since Petr can't pay attention on this perhaps it can be passed thru > your tree? > > Sergey, Steven, what do you think? I'm fine with these changes. Sergey, what do you think? -- Steve