mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: On trace_*_rcuidle functions in modules
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:48:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415204827.24f2c548@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLX2UDQ7=dvzMoP6g-rYzw9dBebrynMfo4Gnv=SzaqhE=g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:06:24 -0700
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:

> So you're saying the recent change to move to using trace_*_rcuidle()
> was unnecessary?
> 
> Or is there a different notifier then cpu_pm_register_notifier() that
> the driver should be using (that one seems to be using
> atomic_notifier_chain_register())?

From looking at the trace event in __tcs_buffer_write() in
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c, the _rcuidle() was added by:

efde2659b0fe8 ("drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Use rcuidle tracepoints for rpmh")

Which shows a backtrace dump of:

     Call trace:
      dump_backtrace+0x0/0x174
      show_stack+0x20/0x2c
      dump_stack+0xc8/0x124
      lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe4/0x104
      __tcs_buffer_write+0x230/0x2d0
      rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data+0x210/0x270
      rpmh_flush+0x84/0x24c
      rpmh_domain_power_off+0x78/0x98
      _genpd_power_off+0x40/0xc0
      genpd_power_off+0x168/0x208
      genpd_power_off+0x1e0/0x208
      genpd_power_off+0x1e0/0x208
      genpd_runtime_suspend+0x1ac/0x220
      __rpm_callback+0x70/0xfc
      rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c
      rpm_suspend+0x218/0x4a4
      __pm_runtime_suspend+0x88/0xac
      psci_enter_domain_idle_state+0x3c/0xb4
      cpuidle_enter_state+0xb8/0x284
      cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x4c
      call_cpuidle+0x3c/0x68
      do_idle+0x194/0x260
      cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x28
      secondary_start_kernel+0x150/0x15c


There's no notifier that calls this. This is called by the rpm_callback
logic. Perhaps that callback will require a call to rcu_irq_enter()
before calling the callback.

In any case, I think it is wrong that these callbacks are called
without RCU watching. The _rcuidle() on that tracepoint should be
removed, and we fix the code that gets there to ensure that RCU is
enabled. I agree with Peter, that no module code should be executed
without RCU watching.

-- Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15  2:20 John Stultz
2020-04-15  2:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-04-15  3:47   ` John Stultz
2020-04-15 13:12     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-04-15 12:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 19:56   ` John Stultz
2020-04-15 20:14     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 20:17       ` John Stultz
2020-04-15 20:41         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 21:02           ` John Stultz
2020-04-15 21:49             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 22:04               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-04-15 22:42                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-15 22:53                   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 22:53                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-04-15 22:51                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 22:54                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-04-16  0:06                   ` John Stultz
2020-04-16  0:48                     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-04-16  1:02                       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-16  1:24                         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-16  2:17                       ` John Stultz
2020-04-15 22:07               ` John Stultz
2020-04-15 22:40       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200415204827.24f2c548@oasis.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome