mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] sched: Kill select_task_rq()'s sd_flag parameter
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:47:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200416104725.GM20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtA5-S_EyzZMDMr9SuVQmWZNdLXOVSLMAMTD+6Bow4jJBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 23:05, Valentin Schneider
> > @@ -6622,13 +6622,25 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> >   * preempt must be disabled.
> >   */
> >  static int
> > +select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
> >  {
> > +       int sync = (wake_flags & WF_SYNC) && !(current->flags & PF_EXITING);
> >         struct sched_domain *tmp, *sd = NULL;
> >         int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >         int new_cpu = prev_cpu;
> >         int want_affine = 0;
> > -       int sync = (wake_flags & WF_SYNC) && !(current->flags & PF_EXITING);
> > +       int sd_flag;
> > +
> > +       switch (wake_flags & (WF_TTWU | WF_FORK | WF_EXEC)) {
> 
> You remove a function parameter, which was directly set with the right
> flag, but then you add a switch case to recreate this sd_flag
> internally. Not sure we can say that it's real benefit
> 
> > +       case WF_TTWU:
> > +               sd_flag = SD_BALANCE_WAKE;
> > +               break;
> > +       case WF_FORK:
> > +               sd_flag = SD_BALANCE_FORK;
> > +               break;
> > +       default:
> > +               sd_flag = SD_BALANCE_EXEC;
> > +       }

Agreed, that's a bit yuck, how about something like so instead:


--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -11,10 +11,12 @@
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
+/* First nibble of SD_flag is shared with WF_flag */
 #define SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE	0x0001	/* Balance when about to become idle */
 #define SD_BALANCE_EXEC		0x0002	/* Balance on exec */
 #define SD_BALANCE_FORK		0x0004	/* Balance on fork, clone */
 #define SD_BALANCE_WAKE		0x0008  /* Balance on wakeup */
+
 #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE		0x0010	/* Wake task to waking CPU */
 #define SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY	0x0020  /* Domain members have different CPU capacities */
 #define SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY	0x0040	/* Domain members share CPU capacity */
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6635,16 +6635,8 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *
 	int want_affine = 0;
 	int sd_flag;
 
-	switch (wake_flags & (WF_TTWU | WF_FORK | WF_EXEC)) {
-	case WF_TTWU:
-		sd_flag = SD_BALANCE_WAKE;
-		break;
-	case WF_FORK:
-		sd_flag = SD_BALANCE_FORK;
-		break;
-	default:
-		sd_flag = SD_BALANCE_EXEC;
-	}
+	/* SD_flags and WF_flags share the first nibble */
+	sd_flag = wake_flags & 0xf;
 
 	if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
 		record_wakee(p);
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1685,11 +1685,12 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(s
 /*
  * Wake flags
  */
-#define WF_SYNC			0x01		/* Waker goes to sleep after wakeup */
-#define WF_TTWU                 0x02            /* Regular task wakeup */
-#define WF_FORK			0x04		/* Child wakeup after fork */
-#define WF_EXEC			0x08		/* "Fake" wakeup at exec */
-#define WF_MIGRATED		0x10		/* Internal use, task got migrated */
+#define WF_EXEC			0x02	/* SD_BALANCE_EXEC */
+#define WF_FORK			0x04	/* SD_BALANCE_FORK */
+#define WF_TTWU			0x08	/* SD_BALANCE_WAKE */
+
+#define WF_SYNC			0x10	/* Waker goes to sleep after wakeup */
+#define WF_MIGRATED		0x20	/* Internal use, task got migrated */
 
 /*
  * To aid in avoiding the subversion of "niceness" due to uneven distribution

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 21:05 [PATCH v3 0/9] sched: Streamline select_task_rq() & select_task_rq_fair() Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] sched/fair: find_idlest_group(): Remove unused sd_flag parameter Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16  7:40   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-01 18:22   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] sched/debug: Make sd->flags sysctl read-only Valentin Schneider
2020-05-01 18:22   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] sched: Remove checks against SD_LOAD_BALANCE Valentin Schneider
2020-05-01 18:22   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] sched/topology: Kill SD_LOAD_BALANCE Valentin Schneider
2020-05-01 18:22   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] sched: Add WF_TTWU, WF_EXEC wakeup flags Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] sched: Kill select_task_rq()'s sd_flag parameter Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16  7:42   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-16 10:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16 10:47     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-04-16 11:43       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] sched/fair: Dissociate wakeup decisions from SD flag value Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] sched/fair: Split select_task_rq_fair want_affine logic Valentin Schneider
2020-04-15 21:05 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] sched/topology: Define and use shortcut pointers for wakeup sd_flag scan Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16  7:46   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-16 10:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16 13:04       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-16 13:36         ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-16 15:27           ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16 15:58             ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-16 20:54               ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] sched: Streamline select_task_rq() & select_task_rq_fair() Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-16 11:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-16 11:02     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-16 13:00     ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200416104725.GM20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome