mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] arm64: csum: Disable KASAN for do_csum()
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:53:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200416115342.GA32443@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200416093106.GB4987@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:31:06AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 08:26:05PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I think abusing a relaxed concurrency primitive for this is
> > not the right thing to do, particularly when the __no_sanitize_address
> > annotation is available. I fact, it's almost an argument in favour
> > of removing READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() so that people use the annotation instead!
> 
> Arguably we *are* using it as a relaxed concurrency primitive, to get a
> snapshot of a varaible undergoing concurrent modification.

That's fair, so it's only the checksum code that was abusing this, which
I've fixed.

> FWIW, for the arm64 unwind code we could add a helper to snapshot the
> frame record, and mark that as __no_sanitize_address, e.g.
> 
> /*
>  * Get a snapshot of a frame record that might be undergoing concurrent
>  * modification (and hence we must also avoid a KASAN splat).
>  */
> static __no_sanitize_address snapshot_frame(struct stackframe *frame,
> 					    unsigned long fp)
> {
> 	frame->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
> 	frame->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
> }
> 
> ... we'd need to do likewied in a few bits of unwind code:
> 
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:	       READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->psw.mask) & PSW_MASK_PSTATE;
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:		ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(sf->gprs[8]);
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:		sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(sf->back_chain);
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:			ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(sf->gprs[8]);
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:			ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->psw.addr);
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:			sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->gprs[15]);
> arch/s390/kernel/unwind_bc.c:		ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(sf->gprs[8]);
> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:	 * Note for KASAN: we deliberately don't use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() here,
> arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h:		val = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x);		\
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:			unsigned long addr = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*stack);
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:	fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((struct inactive_task_frame *)sp)->bp);
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:		ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + sizeof(unsigned long)));
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:		fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)fp);
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c:			word = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*sp);
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c:	addr = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*state->sp);
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c:			unsigned long addr = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*state->sp);
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c:	*val = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)addr);
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c:		state->bp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->bp);
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c:		state->ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->ret_addr);
> include/linux/compiler.h: * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need
> include/linux/compiler.h:#define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x) __READ_ONCE(x, 0)
> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:			 * The READ_ONCE_NOCHECK is used to let KASAN know that
> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:			if ((READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*p)) == stack_dump_trace[i]) {

Indeed. For now, I'm going to keep this simple with the change below, but
I'll revisit this later on because I have another series removing
smp_read_barrier_depends() which makes this a lot simpler.

Will

--->8

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 00a68063d9d5..c363d8debc43 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -212,18 +212,12 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
 	(typeof(x))__x;							\
 })
 
-/*
- * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need
- * to hide memory access from KASAN.
- */
-#define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x)						\
+#define READ_ONCE(x)							\
 ({									\
 	compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(x);				\
 	__READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x);						\
 })
 
-#define READ_ONCE(x)	READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x)
-
 #define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val)				\
 do {							\
 	*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val);		\
@@ -247,6 +241,24 @@ do {							\
 # define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline
 #endif
 
+static __no_kasan_or_inline
+unsigned long __read_once_word_nocheck(const void *addr)
+{
+	return __READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)addr);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need to load a
+ * word from memory atomically but without telling KASAN. This is usually
+ * used by unwinding code when walking the stack of a running process.
+ */
+#define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x)						\
+({									\
+	unsigned long __x = __read_once_word_nocheck(&(x));		\
+	smp_read_barrier_depends();					\
+	__x;								\
+})
+
 static __no_kasan_or_inline
 unsigned long read_word_at_a_time(const void *addr)
 {

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-16 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 16:52 [PATCH v3 00/12] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] compiler/gcc: Emit build-time warning for GCC prior to version 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 17:20   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] netfilter: Avoid assigning 'const' pointer to non-const pointer Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] net: tls: " Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] fault_inject: Don't rely on "return value" from WRITE_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] arm64: csum: Disable KASAN for do_csum() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 17:28   ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-15 18:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 19:43       ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 20:10         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 19:26     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16  9:31       ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-16 11:53         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-04-16 12:11           ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-15 19:26   ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] READ_ONCE: Simplify implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] READ_ONCE: Drop pointer qualifiers when reading from scalar types Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] locking/barriers: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for load-acquire macros Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: barrier: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for acquire/release macros Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] compiler/gcc: Raise minimum GCC version for kernel builds to 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 18:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] gcov: Remove old GCC 3.4 support Will Deacon
2020-04-16 12:30 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-16 12:48   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200416115342.GA32443@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®