From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
paulus@ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, maz@kernel.org,
james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
peterx@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:51:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200419075106.16248-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200419075106.16248-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
structure. Earlier than historical reasons, many kvm-related function
parameters retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time.
This patch does a unified cleanup of these remaining redundant parameters.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 443af3ead739..cf420d013ba3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4173,24 +4173,25 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return rc;
}
-static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
struct runtime_instr_cb *riccb;
struct gs_cb *gscb;
- riccb = (struct runtime_instr_cb *) &kvm_run->s.regs.riccb;
- gscb = (struct gs_cb *) &kvm_run->s.regs.gscb;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = kvm_run->psw_mask;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = kvm_run->psw_addr;
- if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_ARCH0) {
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->todpr = kvm_run->s.regs.todpr;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp = kvm_run->s.regs.pp;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea = kvm_run->s.regs.gbea;
- }
- if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_PFAULT) {
- vcpu->arch.pfault_token = kvm_run->s.regs.pft;
- vcpu->arch.pfault_select = kvm_run->s.regs.pfs;
- vcpu->arch.pfault_compare = kvm_run->s.regs.pfc;
+ riccb = (struct runtime_instr_cb *) &run->s.regs.riccb;
+ gscb = (struct gs_cb *) &run->s.regs.gscb;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = run->psw_mask;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = run->psw_addr;
+ if (run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_ARCH0) {
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->todpr = run->s.regs.todpr;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp = run->s.regs.pp;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea = run->s.regs.gbea;
+ }
+ if (run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_PFAULT) {
+ vcpu->arch.pfault_token = run->s.regs.pft;
+ vcpu->arch.pfault_select = run->s.regs.pfs;
+ vcpu->arch.pfault_compare = run->s.regs.pfc;
if (vcpu->arch.pfault_token == KVM_S390_PFAULT_TOKEN_INVALID)
kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
}
@@ -4198,7 +4199,7 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
* If userspace sets the riccb (e.g. after migration) to a valid state,
* we should enable RI here instead of doing the lazy enablement.
*/
- if ((kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_RICCB) &&
+ if ((run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_RICCB) &&
test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 64) &&
riccb->v &&
!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 & ECB3_RI)) {
@@ -4209,7 +4210,7 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
* If userspace sets the gscb (e.g. after migration) to non-zero,
* we should enable GS here instead of doing the lazy enablement.
*/
- if ((kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_GSCB) &&
+ if ((run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_GSCB) &&
test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 133) &&
gscb->gssm &&
!vcpu->arch.gs_enabled) {
@@ -4218,10 +4219,10 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecd |= ECD_HOSTREGMGMT;
vcpu->arch.gs_enabled = 1;
}
- if ((kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_BPBC) &&
+ if ((run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_BPBC) &&
test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82)) {
vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf &= ~FPF_BPBC;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf |= kvm_run->s.regs.bpbc ? FPF_BPBC : 0;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf |= run->s.regs.bpbc ? FPF_BPBC : 0;
}
if (MACHINE_HAS_GS) {
preempt_disable();
@@ -4232,45 +4233,47 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
}
if (vcpu->arch.gs_enabled) {
current->thread.gs_cb = (struct gs_cb *)
- &vcpu->run->s.regs.gscb;
+ &run->s.regs.gscb;
restore_gs_cb(current->thread.gs_cb);
}
preempt_enable();
}
- /* SIE will load etoken directly from SDNX and therefore kvm_run */
+ /* SIE will load etoken directly from SDNX and therefore run */
}
-static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)
- kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, kvm_run->s.regs.prefix);
- if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_CRS) {
- memcpy(&vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr, &kvm_run->s.regs.crs, 128);
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+
+ if (run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)
+ kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, run->s.regs.prefix);
+ if (run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_CRS) {
+ memcpy(&vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr, &run->s.regs.crs, 128);
/* some control register changes require a tlb flush */
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
}
- if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_ARCH0) {
- kvm_s390_set_cpu_timer(vcpu, kvm_run->s.regs.cputm);
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc = kvm_run->s.regs.ckc;
+ if (run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_ARCH0) {
+ kvm_s390_set_cpu_timer(vcpu, run->s.regs.cputm);
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc = run->s.regs.ckc;
}
save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
- restore_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+ restore_access_regs(run->s.regs.acrs);
/* save host (userspace) fprs/vrs */
save_fpu_regs();
vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.regs = current->thread.fpu.regs;
if (MACHINE_HAS_VX)
- current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs;
+ current->thread.fpu.regs = run->s.regs.vrs;
else
- current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->run->s.regs.fprs;
- current->thread.fpu.fpc = vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc;
+ current->thread.fpu.regs = run->s.regs.fprs;
+ current->thread.fpu.fpc = run->s.regs.fpc;
if (test_fp_ctl(current->thread.fpu.fpc))
/* User space provided an invalid FPC, let's clear it */
current->thread.fpu.fpc = 0;
/* Sync fmt2 only data */
if (likely(!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))) {
- sync_regs_fmt2(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ sync_regs_fmt2(vcpu);
} else {
/*
* In several places we have to modify our internal view to
@@ -4282,19 +4285,21 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
* do only accept the condition code from userspace.
*/
vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_CC;
- vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask |= kvm_run->psw_mask &
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask |= run->psw_mask &
PSW_MASK_CC;
}
- kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
}
-static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- kvm_run->s.regs.todpr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->todpr;
- kvm_run->s.regs.pp = vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp;
- kvm_run->s.regs.gbea = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea;
- kvm_run->s.regs.bpbc = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf & FPF_BPBC) == FPF_BPBC;
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+
+ run->s.regs.todpr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->todpr;
+ run->s.regs.pp = vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp;
+ run->s.regs.gbea = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea;
+ run->s.regs.bpbc = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->fpf & FPF_BPBC) == FPF_BPBC;
if (MACHINE_HAS_GS) {
__ctl_set_bit(2, 4);
if (vcpu->arch.gs_enabled)
@@ -4310,39 +4315,41 @@ static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
/* SIE will save etoken directly into SDNX and therefore kvm_run */
}
-static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- kvm_run->psw_mask = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask;
- kvm_run->psw_addr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr;
- kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu);
- memcpy(&kvm_run->s.regs.crs, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr, 128);
- kvm_run->s.regs.cputm = kvm_s390_get_cpu_timer(vcpu);
- kvm_run->s.regs.ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
- kvm_run->s.regs.pft = vcpu->arch.pfault_token;
- kvm_run->s.regs.pfs = vcpu->arch.pfault_select;
- kvm_run->s.regs.pfc = vcpu->arch.pfault_compare;
- save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+
+ run->psw_mask = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask;
+ run->psw_addr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr;
+ run->s.regs.prefix = kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu);
+ memcpy(&run->s.regs.crs, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr, 128);
+ run->s.regs.cputm = kvm_s390_get_cpu_timer(vcpu);
+ run->s.regs.ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
+ run->s.regs.pft = vcpu->arch.pfault_token;
+ run->s.regs.pfs = vcpu->arch.pfault_select;
+ run->s.regs.pfc = vcpu->arch.pfault_compare;
+ save_access_regs(run->s.regs.acrs);
restore_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
/* Save guest register state */
save_fpu_regs();
- vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
+ run->s.regs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
/* Restore will be done lazily at return */
current->thread.fpu.fpc = vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc;
current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.regs;
if (likely(!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)))
- store_regs_fmt2(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ store_regs_fmt2(vcpu);
}
int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
int rc;
- if (kvm_run->immediate_exit)
+ if (run->immediate_exit)
return -EINTR;
- if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS ||
- kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS)
+ if (run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS ||
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS)
return -EINVAL;
vcpu_load(vcpu);
@@ -4368,14 +4375,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
}
- sync_regs(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ sync_regs(vcpu);
enable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);
might_fault();
rc = __vcpu_run(vcpu);
if (signal_pending(current) && !rc) {
- kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
+ run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
rc = -EINTR;
}
@@ -4390,7 +4397,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
disable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);
- store_regs(vcpu, kvm_run);
+ store_regs(vcpu);
kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-19 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-19 7:50 [PATCH 0/7] " Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-19 7:51 ` Tianjia Zhang [this message]
2020-04-20 7:07 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: " Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-20 7:17 ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-20 8:25 ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-19 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: arm64: " Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-19 7:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: PPC: Remove redundant kvm_run from vcpu_arch Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-19 7:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: PPC: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-19 7:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: PPC: clean up redundant kvm_run parameters in assembly Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-19 7:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-19 7:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant kvm_run parameters in assembly Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-20 10:32 ` maobibo
2020-04-20 10:42 ` Tianjia Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200419075106.16248-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®