[PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, x32: Fix invalid instruction in BPF_LDX zero-extension

[Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu>]

The current JIT uses the following sequence to zero-extend into the
upper 32 bits of the destination register for BPF_LDX BPF_{B,H,W},
when the destination register is not on the stack:

  EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0);

However, this is not a valid instruction on x86.

This patch fixes the problem by instead emitting "xor dst_hi,dst_hi"
to clear the upper 32 bits.

This bug may not be currently triggerable as BPF_REG_AX is the only
register not stored on the stack and the verifier uses it in a limited
way, and the verifier implements a zero-extension optimization. But the
JIT should avoid emitting invalid instructions regardless.

Fixes: 03f5781be2c7b ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32")
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 4d2a7a764602..cc9ad3892ea6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1854,7 +1854,9 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
 					      STACK_VAR(dst_hi));
 					EMIT(0x0, 4);
 				} else {
-					EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0);
+					/* xor dst_hi,dst_hi */
+					EMIT2(0x33,
+					      add_2reg(0xC0, dst_hi, dst_hi));
 				}
 				break;
 			case BPF_DW:
-- 
2.17.1