mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>, "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] w1: omap-hdq: Simplify driver with PM runtime autosuspend
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:20:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421182017.GC37466@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70F19A6E-7B36-4873-9364-F284A14EE3A0@goldelico.com>

* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> [200421 18:14]:
> > Am 21.04.2020 um 20:02 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>:
> > This is 37xx though, maybe you have 35xx and there's some errata
> > that we're not handling?
> 
> No, it is dm3730 on three different units I have tried.
> 
> > I'm only seeing "2.7. HDQTM/1-Wire® Communication Constraints"
> > for external pull-up resitor in 34xx errata at [0].
> > 
> > I wonder if wrong external pull could cause flakyeness after
> > enabling the hdq module?
> 
> I have checked and we have 10 kOhm pullup to 1.8 V and a 470 Ohm
> series resistor.

OK

> > If nothing else helps, you could try to block idle for hdq
> > module, but I have a feeling that's a workaround for something
> > else.
> 
> Well, what helps is reverting the patch and using the old driver
> (which did work for several years). So I would not assume that
> there is a hardware influence. It seems to be something the new
> driver is doing differently.

Well earlier hdq1w.c did not idle, now it does. If you just want
to keep it enabled like earlier, you can just add something like:

&hdqw1w {
	ti,no-idle;
};

> I need more time to understand and trace this issue on what it
> depends... It may depend on the sequence some other modules are
> loaded and what the user-space (udevd) is doing in the meantime.

Yes would be good to understand what goes wrong here before we
apply the ti,no-idle as that will block SoC deeper idle states.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-17  0:40 Tony Lindgren
2020-04-16 15:02 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-16 18:46   ` Tony Lindgren
2020-04-16 20:04     ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-04-16 20:33       ` Tony Lindgren
2020-04-17 14:21         ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-17 14:22     ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-17 14:43       ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-04-17 14:52         ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-17 15:07           ` Tony Lindgren
2020-04-17 15:14             ` Tony Lindgren
2020-04-17 15:36               ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-04-17 21:03             ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-20 15:08               ` Tony Lindgren
2020-04-20 21:11                 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-21  6:53                   ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-04-21 18:02                     ` Tony Lindgren
2020-04-21 18:13                       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-21 18:20                         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2020-04-21 18:24                           ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-04-21 20:40                           ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-22 10:04                             ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-04-22 16:06                               ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
     [not found]                                 ` <A2AC3E81-49B2-4CF2-A7CF-6075AEB1B72D@goldelico.com>
2020-04-25 10:29                                   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-25 10:37                                     ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-29 21:34                                       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-04-29 21:38                                         ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-09 11:47                                           ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-05-09 13:59                                             ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200421182017.GC37466@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hns@goldelico.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome