Re: [PATCH 13/23] sched,ion: Convert to sched_set_normal()

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:21:45PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 13:29, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > In an attempt to take away sched_setscheduler() from modules, change
> > this into sched_set_normal(.nice = 19).
> >
> > Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c |    3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c
> > @@ -244,8 +244,6 @@ static int ion_heap_deferred_free(void *
> >
> >  int ion_heap_init_deferred_free(struct ion_heap *heap)
> >  {
> > -       struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 0 };
> > -
> >         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&heap->free_list);
> >         init_waitqueue_head(&heap->waitqueue);
> >         heap->task = kthread_run(ion_heap_deferred_free, heap,
> > @@ -255,7 +253,7 @@ int ion_heap_init_deferred_free(struct i
> >                        __func__);
> >                 return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(heap->task);
> >         }
> > -       sched_setscheduler(heap->task, SCHED_IDLE, &param);
> > +       sched_set_normal(heap->task, 19);
> 
> Would it make sense to have a sched_set_idle(task) to enable kernel
> setting SCHED_IDLE task ?
> 
> SCHED_NORMAL w/ nice 19 and SCHED_IDLE tasks are not treated in the
> same way when checking for preemption at  wakeup

Yeah, but does it really matter? I did indeed consider it, but got
lazy. Is there a definite need for IDLE?