From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D680C2BA19 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023C121473 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728357AbgDXAlZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:41:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54538 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728151AbgDXAlY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:41:24 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16DCD20724; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:41:22 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Hillf Danton Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Mike Galbraith , lkml , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: make p->prio independent of p->mm Message-ID: <20200423204122.4c19b835@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200424003028.14800-1-hdanton@sina.com> References: <20200423040128.6120-1-hdanton@sina.com> <20200423092620.GR20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200423141609.5224-1-hdanton@sina.com> <20200424003028.14800-1-hdanton@sina.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:30:28 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote: > > I believe Peter meant axing the double check, not the check together. > > > > That is, instead of: > > > > if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) { > > if (attr->sched_priority > MAX_RT_PRIO - 1) > > return -EINVAL; > > } else { > > if (attr->sched_priority > MAX_USER_RT_PRIO - 1) > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > Just have: > > > > if (attr->sched_priority > MAX_RT_PRIO -1) > > return -EINVAL; > > > Got it, thank you :) Spin in couple of days. I still think getting rid of MAX_USER_RT_PRIO would be good too. -- Steve