From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9FBC83006 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26682206E2 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726939AbgD1N1o (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:27:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59314 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726825AbgD1N1n (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:27:43 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8044206D7; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:27:41 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Scott Wood Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] newidle_balance() latency mitigation Message-ID: <20200428092741.3170d28e@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200428050242.17717-1-swood@redhat.com> References: <20200428050242.17717-1-swood@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:02:39 -0500 Scott Wood wrote: > There was a note at the end about wanting further discussion on the matter -- > does anyone remember if that ever happened and what the conclusion was? > Are there any other issues with enabling interrupts here and/or moving > the newidle_balance() call? Honestly, I think we got distracted by other issues and never revisited it :-/ -- Steve