From: Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Luke Nelson" <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
"Xi Wang" <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf, riscv: Optimize BPF_JSET BPF_K using andi on RV64
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 17:03:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506000320.28965-5-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506000320.28965-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
This patch optimizes BPF_JSET BPF_K by using a RISC-V andi instruction
when the BPF immediate fits in 12 bits, instead of first loading the
immediate to a temporary register.
Examples of generated code with and without this optimization:
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) without optimization:
20: li t1,2
24: and t1,a0,t1
28: bnez t1,0x30
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) with optimization:
20: andi t1,a0,2
24: bnez t1,0x2c
BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) without optimization:
20: li t1,2
24: mv t2,a0
28: slli t2,t2,0x20
2c: srli t2,t2,0x20
30: slli t1,t1,0x20
34: srli t1,t1,0x20
38: and t1,t2,t1
3c: bnez t1,0x44
BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) with optimization:
20: andi t1,a0,2
24: bnez t1,0x2c
In these examples, because the upper 32 bits of the sign-extended
immediate are 0, BPF_JMP BPF_JSET and BPF_JMP32 BPF_JSET are equivalent
and therefore the JIT produces identical code for them.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index b07cef952019..6cfd164cbe88 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -792,8 +792,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
- case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
- case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx);
s = ctx->ninsns;
if (imm) {
@@ -813,15 +811,28 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
/* Adjust for extra insns */
rvoff -= (e - s) << 2;
+ emit_branch(BPF_OP(code), rd, rs, rvoff, ctx);
+ break;
- if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_JSET) {
- /* Adjust for and */
- rvoff -= 4;
- emit(rv_and(rs, rd, rs), ctx);
- emit_branch(BPF_JNE, rs, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, ctx);
+ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
+ case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
+ rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx);
+ s = ctx->ninsns;
+ if (is_12b_int(imm)) {
+ emit(rv_andi(RV_REG_T1, rd, imm), ctx);
} else {
- emit_branch(BPF_OP(code), rd, rs, rvoff, ctx);
+ emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, imm, ctx);
+ emit(rv_and(RV_REG_T1, rd, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
}
+ /* For jset32, we should clear the upper 32 bits of t1, but
+ * sign-extension is sufficient here and saves one instruction,
+ * as t1 is used only in comparison against zero.
+ */
+ if (!is64 && imm < 0)
+ emit(rv_addiw(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_T1, 0), ctx);
+ e = ctx->ninsns;
+ rvoff -= (e - s) << 2;
+ emit_branch(BPF_JNE, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, ctx);
break;
/* function call */
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 0:03 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] RV64 BPF JIT Optimizations Luke Nelson
2020-05-06 0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, riscv: Enable missing verifier_zext optimizations on RV64 Luke Nelson
2020-05-06 0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf, riscv: Optimize FROM_LE using verifier_zext " Luke Nelson
2020-05-06 0:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf, riscv: Optimize BPF_JMP BPF_K when imm == 0 " Luke Nelson
2020-05-06 0:03 ` Luke Nelson [this message]
2020-05-06 7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] RV64 BPF JIT Optimizations Björn Töpel
2020-05-06 8:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200506000320.28965-5-luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
--to=lukenels@cs.washington.edu \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®