From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BF3C38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 08:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E08207DD for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 08:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="stwK/rg8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726946AbgEHIop (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 04:44:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50688 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726817AbgEHIop (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 04:44:45 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B85C05BD43 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 01:44:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=vvsnZdJK1KPGBbaDhgFcB52JNykKzmJoeey033uXyMA=; b=stwK/rg8jeJmIa697Y0bt+U7tI mnpguk5kmkLxPeJ3VYZi8vYTL7tm1vYoStmTWRejPI6T1raQRCfrf7EbsdVZy6vtTv5+NK187A6ey q3u4H1f/vvB8ig9uXHjxP8r12F02k4ozcxx+rrubFWq3lTsfyOTWCBZv0kMShBuTGWFziNt0GUrk/ mjYxO0/XVGye7K9Br/Rarvvaq6vRYpVw1kDNdZjNc+3QQtNNb4x/9Jkig2QJoctvPk4Vfs00TzdqT RbgNXr5OkT8Y/bMLc7EgSpVB/d/+rBf+lvoLTkc1ECkk7ximys08Ds5T9AmYY42Vjz6+LWZmfBzsu MEVGwV/w==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jWycP-0004tZ-Bo; Fri, 08 May 2020 08:44:29 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D91130018B; Fri, 8 May 2020 10:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0740E2B93BDBC; Fri, 8 May 2020 10:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 10:44:26 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Andy Lutomirski , Alexandre Chartre , Frederic Weisbecker , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Joel Fernandes , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Brian Gerst , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 24/36] lockdep: Prepare for noinstr sections Message-ID: <20200508084426.GR5298@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200505131602.633487962@linutronix.de> <20200505134100.484532537@linutronix.de> <20200507202339.0abc360f@oasis.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200507202339.0abc360f@oasis.local.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:23:39PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > +void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip) > > +void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip) > Would be nice to have some kerneldoc explaining the difference between > lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare() and lockdep_hardirqs_on(). As the naming suggests, it's not a matter of difference, but of order, first you call on_prepare(), then you call on(). The function signature as per the above gives clue why.