From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: perf: Implement correct cap_user_time
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 14:41:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512124450.824507755@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512124058.833263033@infradead.org>
As reported by Leo; the existing implementation is broken when the
clock and counter don't intersect at 0.
Use the sched_clock's struct clock_read_data information to correctly
implement cap_user_time and cap_user_time_zero.
Note that the ARM64 counter is architecturally only guaranteed to be
56bit wide (implementations are allowed to be wider) and the existing
perf ABI cannot deal with wrap-around.
This implementation should also be faster than the old; seeing how we
don't need to recompute mult and shift all the time.
Reported-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/sched_clock.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
/* ARMv8 Cortex-A53 specific event types. */
@@ -1165,28 +1166,45 @@ device_initcall(armv8_pmu_driver_init)
void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_event_mmap_page *userpg, u64 now)
{
- u32 freq;
- u32 shift;
+ struct clock_read_data *rd;
+ unsigned int seq;
/*
* Internal timekeeping for enabled/running/stopped times
* is always computed with the sched_clock.
*/
- freq = arch_timer_get_rate();
userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
+ userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
+
+ do {
+ rd = sched_clock_read_begin(&seq);
+
+ userpg->time_mult = rd->mult;
+ userpg->time_shift = rd->shift;
+ userpg->time_zero = rd->epoch_ns;
+
+ /*
+ * This isn't strictly correct, the ARM64 counter can be
+ * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. The correct
+ * thing would be to extend the perf ABI with a cycle and mask
+ * value, but because wrapping on ARM64 is very rare in
+ * practise this 'works'.
+ */
+ userpg->time_zero -= (rd->epoch_cyc * rd->mult) >> rd->shift;
+
+ } while (sched_clock_read_retry(seq));
+
+ userpg->time_offset = userpg->time_zero - now;
- clocks_calc_mult_shift(&userpg->time_mult, &shift, freq,
- NSEC_PER_SEC, 0);
/*
* time_shift is not expected to be greater than 31 due to
* the original published conversion algorithm shifting a
* 32-bit value (now specifies a 64-bit value) - refer
* perf_event_mmap_page documentation in perf_event.h.
*/
- if (shift == 32) {
- shift = 31;
+ if (userpg->shift == 32) {
+ userpg->shift = 31;
userpg->time_mult >>= 1;
}
- userpg->time_shift = (u16)shift;
- userpg->time_offset = -now;
+
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 12:40 [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched_clock: Expose struct clock_read_data Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-05-12 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: perf: Implement correct cap_user_time Leo Yan
2020-05-12 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 16:05 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: perf: Only advertise cap_user_time for arch_timer Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf: Add perf_event_mmap_page::cap_user_time_short ABI Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 12:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: perf: Add cap_user_time_short Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 14:11 ` Leo Yan
2020-05-12 16:59 ` kbuild test robot
2020-07-13 6:08 ` [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support Leo Yan
2020-07-13 10:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-13 12:58 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512124450.824507755@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®