From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFCEC433DF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD88B2078C for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uoMTFB4J" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729350AbgEZOrx (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 10:47:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49404 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726437AbgEZOrw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 10:47:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466E7C03E96D for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 07:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id b6so20742719qkh.11 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 07:47:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DF52Yl3w2y2rZvHSbpSmCXcEBNFth4QYKFFksKvfyHA=; b=uoMTFB4Jq9fuHWg38dVBHhBsx0erHTJlOdrJT8Y+Zur+CTH9QlKZ/LDlXJa9U5YAEX WpQk/NcZ1KkxyJ4+QrkQqCcnBpIzuWWxHCzXNL+6oCsQp5HFkWDISaMRp8AATPLqyWH3 roGY5zkVxoDaZkW3kVKC1rQIRAo1Y1671HGukCqXkTZNh1awtqAGZ9PaNzVISYlamSwX 0kUfbcnhc2I8CF5IvNOogiub9I3OHbQp+a0LISEY23XdAeY4fKUlxsVB39Im19kUs+sX TVjNYfwIjSKjBbw0suCxhvMT/WoBKDstub4MKtrg5bDXS9Xtircs1G15QyjnIyoPMZ9a p4eA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DF52Yl3w2y2rZvHSbpSmCXcEBNFth4QYKFFksKvfyHA=; b=IoKJ5KWgtbo0ecJJ64YecjfxX1I9YlaW5qoYJ6QSh/QshijeV3PrVUtideAOK5E0A9 pZnf8/Is6saCVS5lEoudA/ZjY52UgyoUxA1LAsauRLmCuA2n8ILihBrBdanvLOElGXbQ hdvIW1KZiiciD9sVIELSv7bgydTHqSKrBCgi2/9iPggkkM7DsYr/S3OgE5P4yeck6uBt JhPRFnQbwe71Xs4MdAyzFWoG8mgNkhRQOApQ58pc0PY9y5uEPBJ0K6e+HoZ05FUFjxSK FTclgQs8yDq1kfFypgzDZGU2fs+ZBGOpq+K2jrvugHTL7qdNZWd3c5EKJ2h8VwgwoImg HXiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bjglT0CrXKkAgFBahKl/e+/dQh+kPSI+/4qLj6iqRw4JcOIDY qYnRd6XMVcQachaGSviwl6M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgaF6EiLvLMP9AVUuWiD8h4H9f1puyBPFieaz59Jb5Beh0O26mDaWvCpahZ9QLmdtMqy2zeg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:7904:: with SMTP id u4mr1723991qkc.297.1590504471446; Tue, 26 May 2020 07:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rani.riverdale.lan ([2001:470:1f07:5f3::b55f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b189sm7453670qkg.110.2020.05.26.07.47.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 May 2020 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Arvind Sankar X-Google-Original-From: Arvind Sankar Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:47:48 -0400 To: Sedat Dilek Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Arvind Sankar , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , X86 ML , Nick Desaulniers , Fangrui Song , Dmitry Golovin , Clang-Built-Linux ML , Masahiro Yamada , Daniel Kiper , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from compressed kernel Message-ID: <20200526144748.GA2190602@rani.riverdale.lan> References: <20200524212816.243139-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <20200525225918.1624470-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Are those diffs correct when using "x86/boot: Correct relocation > destination on old linkers"? > It looks ok, but that patch (and even marking the other symbols .hidden) should be unnecessary after this series.