[PATCH 2/2] workqueue: remove useless POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE

[Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>]

It is the same meaning as pool->manager now.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index fde10a5dba82..8bc11075763b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ enum {
 	 * wq_pool_attach_mutex to avoid changing binding state while
 	 * worker_attach_to_pool() is in progress.
 	 */
-	POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE	= 1 << 0,	/* being managed */
 	POOL_DISASSOCIATED	= 1 << 2,	/* cpu can't serve workers */
 
 	/* worker flags */
@@ -798,7 +797,7 @@ static bool need_to_create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 /* Do we have too many workers and should some go away? */
 static bool too_many_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
-	bool managing = pool->flags & POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE;
+	bool managing = !!pool->manager;
 	int nr_idle = pool->nr_idle + managing; /* manager is considered idle */
 	int nr_busy = pool->nr_workers - nr_idle;
 
@@ -2132,7 +2131,7 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
 					struct work_struct, entry);
 	struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
 
-	if (pool->flags & POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE)
+	if (pool->manager)
 		return false;
 
 	/*
@@ -2143,13 +2142,11 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
 	 */
 	get_pwq(pwq);
 
-	pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE;
 	pool->manager = worker;
 
 	maybe_create_worker(pool);
 
 	pool->manager = NULL;
-	pool->flags &= ~POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE;
 	put_pwq(pwq);
 	return true;
 }
-- 
2.20.1