From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] lib: test get_count_order/long in test_bitops.c
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 22:31:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200608223112.ftncszh7hfnmqj3m@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605171629.d931068c1a4d720d8faa2704@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:16:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:06:10 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:51:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >Hi Wei,
>> >
>> >On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:28 PM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >>
>> >> You mean
>> >>
>> >> {0x0000000000000003, 2},
>> >> {0x0000000000000004, 2},
>> >> {0x0000000000001fff, 13},
>> >> {0x0000000000002000, 13},
>> >> {0x0000000050000000, 31},
>> >> {0x0000000080000000, 31},
>> >> {0x0000000080003000, 32},
>> >
>> >Yes, those values. And those should work with get_count_order_long()
>> >on both 32-bit and 64-bit.
>
>Geert meant "no, the values in order_comb[]" :)
>
>We have a table of numbers in order_comb[] so we may as well feed them
>into get_count_order_long() (as well as get_count_order()) just for a
>bit more testing.
>
>So how about the below? order_comb_long[] just can't be used on 32-bit
>machines because their longs are 32-bit. If we had a
>get_count_order_u64() then we could use it.
>
>I haven't runtime tested this - could you please do so?
>
>
>static unsigned int order_comb[][2] = {
> {0x00000003, 2},
> {0x00000004, 2},
> {0x00001fff, 13},
> {0x00002000, 13},
> {0x50000000, 31},
> {0x80000000, 31},
> {0x80003000, 32},
>};
>
>#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>static unsigned long order_comb_long[][2] = {
> {0x0000000300000000, 34},
> {0x0000000400000000, 34},
> {0x00001fff00000000, 45},
> {0x0000200000000000, 45},
> {0x5000000000000000, 63},
> {0x8000000000000000, 63},
> {0x8000300000000000, 64},
>};
>#endif
>
>static int __init test_bitops_startup(void)
>{
> int i;
>
> pr_warn("Loaded test module\n");
> set_bit(BITOPS_4, g_bitmap);
> set_bit(BITOPS_7, g_bitmap);
> set_bit(BITOPS_11, g_bitmap);
> set_bit(BITOPS_31, g_bitmap);
> set_bit(BITOPS_88, g_bitmap);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
> if (order_comb[i][1] != get_count_order(order_comb[i][0]))
> pr_warn("get_count_order wrong for %x\n",
> order_comb[i][0]);
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
> if (order_comb[i][1] != get_count_order_long(order_comb[i][0]))
> pr_warn("get_count_order_long wrong for %x\n",
> order_comb[i][0]);
> }
>
>#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
> if (order_comb_long[i][1] !=
> get_count_order_long(order_comb_long[i][0]))
> pr_warn("get_count_order_long wrong for %lx\n",
> order_comb_long[i][0]);
> }
>#endif
> return 0;
>}
>
>
>From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>Subject: lib-test-get_count_order-long-in-test_bitopsc-fix
>
>Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
>Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>---
>
> lib/test_bitops.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>--- a/lib/test_bitops.c~lib-test-get_count_order-long-in-test_bitopsc-fix
>+++ a/lib/test_bitops.c
>@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ enum bitops_fun {
>
> static DECLARE_BITMAP(g_bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
>
>-unsigned int order_comb[][2] = {
>+static unsigned int order_comb[][2] = {
> {0x00000003, 2},
> {0x00000004, 2},
> {0x00001fff, 13},
>@@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ unsigned int order_comb[][2] = {
> {0x80003000, 32},
> };
>
>-unsigned long order_comb_long[][2] = {
>+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>+static unsigned long order_comb_long[][2] = {
> {0x0000000300000000, 34},
> {0x0000000400000000, 34},
> {0x00001fff00000000, 45},
>@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ unsigned long order_comb_long[][2] = {
> {0x8000000000000000, 63},
> {0x8000300000000000, 64},
> };
>+#endif
>
> static int __init test_bitops_startup(void)
> {
>@@ -62,14 +64,23 @@ static int __init test_bitops_startup(vo
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
> if (order_comb[i][1] != get_count_order(order_comb[i][0]))
> pr_warn("get_count_order wrong for %x\n",
>- order_comb[i][0]); }
>+ order_comb[i][0]);
>+ }
>
>- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb_long); i++) {
>+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
>+ if (order_comb[i][1] != get_count_order_long(order_comb[i][0]))
>+ pr_warn("get_count_order_long wrong for %x\n",
>+ order_comb[i][0]);
>+ }
>+
>+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
^
I am afraid this one should be order_comb_long?
The test on 64bit machine pass. Since I don't have a 32bit machine by hand,
Geert, would you mind have a try on 32bit machine?
> if (order_comb_long[i][1] !=
> get_count_order_long(order_comb_long[i][0]))
> pr_warn("get_count_order_long wrong for %lx\n",
>- order_comb_long[i][0]); }
>-
>+ order_comb_long[i][0]);
>+ }
>+#endif
> return 0;
> }
>
>_
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-08 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-02 22:37 Wei Yang
2020-06-03 9:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-03 13:29 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-04 11:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-04 12:28 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-04 12:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-05 23:06 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-06 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-08 22:31 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-06-09 9:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 23:02 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-10 10:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-10 22:06 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-11 7:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-12 14:28 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200608223112.ftncszh7hfnmqj3m@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®