From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837B8C433DF for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658DB20829 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726442AbgFJHOP (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:14:15 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45715 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726276AbgFJHOO (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:14:14 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id ADF4A68AEF; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:14:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:14:10 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Rientjes Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Alex Xu (Hello71)" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, bp@alien8.de, hch@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, Pavel Machek , perex@perex.cz, tglx@linutronix.de, tiwai@suse.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: next-0519 on thinkpad x60: sound related? window manager crash Message-ID: <20200610071410.GD1397@lst.de> References: <20200520111136.GA3802@amd> <1591545088.74ii116nf2.none@localhost> <20200608061950.GA17476@lst.de> <1591624340.z01ejtod28.none@localhost> <20200609054306.GA9606@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:26:45PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > If this option should not implicitly be set for DMA_COHERENT_POOL, then I > assume we need yet another Kconfig option since DMA_REMAP selected it > before and DMA_COHERENT_POOL selects DMA_REMAP :) Yes, but what do we actually need DMA_REMAP for just for the coherent pool? We shuldn't really remap anything for AMD-SEV. Sorry for not noticing this earlier.