Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: add F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE ioctl

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:16:52PM +0900, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> +	for (index = pg_start; index < pg_end;) {
> +		struct dnode_of_data dn;
> +		unsigned int end_offset;
> +
> +		set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> +		ret = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, index, LOOKUP_NODE);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		end_offset = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_page, inode);
> +		if (pg_end < end_offset + index)
> +			end_offset = pg_end - index;
> +
> +		for (; dn.ofs_in_node < end_offset;
> +				dn.ofs_in_node++, index++) {
> +			struct block_device *cur_bdev;
> +			block_t blkaddr = f2fs_data_blkaddr(&dn);
> +
> +			if (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(blkaddr)) {
> +				if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> +					blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> +					ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +					goto out;
> +				}
> +			} else
> +				continue;
> +
> +			cur_bdev = f2fs_target_device(sbi, blkaddr, NULL);
> +			if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
> +				int i = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkaddr);
> +
> +				blkaddr -= FDEV(i).start_blk;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (len) {
> +				if (prev_bdev == cur_bdev &&
> +					blkaddr == prev_block + len) {
> +					len++;
> +				} else {
> +					ret = f2fs_secure_erase(prev_bdev,
> +							prev_block, len, flags);
> +					if (ret)
> +						goto out;
> +
> +					len = 0;
> +				}
> +			}
> +
> +			if (!len) {
> +				prev_bdev = cur_bdev;
> +				prev_block = blkaddr;
> +				len = 1;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> +	}

This loop processes the entire file, which may be very large.  So it could take
a very long time to execute.

It should at least use the following to make the task killable and preemptible:

		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
			err = -EINTR;
			goto out;
		}
		cond_resched();

Also, perhaps this ioctl should be made incremental, i.e. take in an
(offset, length) like pwrite()?

- Eric