From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sascha Ortmann <sascha.ortmann@stud.uni-hannover.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de,
Maximilian Werner <maximilian.werner96@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/boottime: Fix kprobe multiple events
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:06:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617110617.2a06c143@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617110521.7ed41fdd@oasis.local.home>
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:05:21 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:08:17 +0200
> Sascha Ortmann <sascha.ortmann@stud.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
>
> > Fix boottime kprobe events to add multiple events even if one fails
> > and report probe generation failures.
> >
> > As an example, when we try to set multiprobe kprobe events in
> > bootconfig like this:
> >
> > ftrace.event.kprobes.vfsevents {
> > probes = "vfs_read $arg1 $arg2,,
> > !error! not reported;?", // leads to error
> > "vfs_write $arg1 $arg2"
> > }
> >
> > this will not work like expected. After commit
> > da0f1f4167e3af69e1d8b32d6d65195ddd2bfb64 ("tracing/boottime:
> > Fix kprobe event API usage"), the function
> > trace_boot_add_kprobe_event will not produce any error message,
> > aborting the function and stopping subsequent probes from getting
> > installed when adding a probe fails at kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start.
> > Furthermore, probes continue when kprobe_event_gen_cmd_end fails
> > (and kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start did not fail). In this case the
> > function even returns successfully when the last call to
> > kprobe_event_gen_cmd_end is successful.
> >
> > The behaviour of reporting and aborting after failures is not
> > consistent.
> >
> > The function trace_boot_add_kprobe_event now continues even when
> > one of the multiple events fails. Each failure is now reported
> > individually. Since the function can only return one result to the
> > caller, the function returns now the last failure (or none, if
> > nothing fails).
> >
> > Cc: linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de
> > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Werner <maximilian.werner96@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Ortmann <sascha.ortmann@stud.uni-hannover.de>
>
> Why the double signed off by?
>
> Masami, I'm fine with this, but needs your review.
[ It appears that Masami wasn't in the Cc ]
>
> -- Steve
>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_boot.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c b/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c
> > index 9de29bb45a27..dbb50184e060 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_boot.c
> > @@ -95,18 +95,24 @@ trace_boot_add_kprobe_event(struct xbc_node *node, const char *event)
> > struct xbc_node *anode;
> > char buf[MAX_BUF_LEN];
> > const char *val;
> > + int error = 0;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > xbc_node_for_each_array_value(node, "probes", anode, val) {
> > kprobe_event_cmd_init(&cmd, buf, MAX_BUF_LEN);
> >
> > - ret = kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(&cmd, event, val);
> > - if (ret)
> > - break;
> > + error = kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(&cmd, event, val);
> > + if (error) {
> > + pr_err("Failed to generate probe: %s\n", buf);
> > + ret = error;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> >
> > - ret = kprobe_event_gen_cmd_end(&cmd);
> > - if (ret)
> > + error = kprobe_event_gen_cmd_end(&cmd);
> > + if (error) {
> > pr_err("Failed to add probe: %s\n", buf);
> > + ret = error;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > return ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 14:08 Sascha Ortmann
2020-06-17 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-17 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-06-17 15:57 ` Maximilian Werner
2020-06-17 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-18 1:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-06-18 16:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Sascha Ortmann
2020-06-19 1:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200617110617.2a06c143@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximilian.werner96@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sascha.ortmann@stud.uni-hannover.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®