From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88778C433E2 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B19206F1 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="aAA1aFkx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731553AbgFSMLN (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 08:11:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728851AbgFSMLL (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 08:11:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4368C06174E for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id h5so9477531wrc.7 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:11:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uw1fRJk8W9uzHYW58SXoTwxg2AWOnCyPtVa0nujwxNo=; b=aAA1aFkxA985YEVfjLAPiKf66EhzPWckcNx4xKon5snQWNwK/YtUsVhxAr8entll5J FqpecJvgTmxRT5+MvuHxJe9wSNpmI0nvvrBzF3a6gi+LUIybTOg+JYdbJqT0dZYlFxMk KKN+iSVJrEIms+E2BI5fXbNWVdsb2j9/Lm4zmMbjwR4aASLWSTAHS8bjK4ndoX9Radrz tAJ9VVNEEMY8zPNBspED7etWgK9KAxQVfeSI4+eLeelOpXXdGi5OUzXSQ1/NP3AapKjN 3YhofK/HVDX+bv/bUFdvGIO34LjDkJ5lop0TmHsA2yBXmfMLzQrW56prXHQF0G2R0N+F /h3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uw1fRJk8W9uzHYW58SXoTwxg2AWOnCyPtVa0nujwxNo=; b=Vy2JUtjE+BJ87X/RSL9F1CHYUfU7AjCKRPQ5F0m+EcTWg1bX+EF06qbqXIqQl/XMW3 Z3iSjl2NCsoy64ZSFwjRbMtp+pbIhD70mnojZj+0ojwxzXJ0tKUJQ9jPaDMpeaVWK4Ky RcqOkwYfZkOOcptZGHVSGDPSOW7UY0cYBE/vNxYjUiJI2HdC4Tc/IM80tkcpvUzmwDsw 25twX/I6VvqRI53pY7T4OWGeodFkXTVe65xh9fKpxjUGr1bRhCOTrSEwQMiPuL5R6bSx BuKqLGn8pS5UsNisRDxcOMsfbnuSS/l0Iv/lPH21K+1AJpty3QzzTHQuJGjBkEuv7F5A QBLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312tf9l3ZuuNLKZK6juQ3kVXqbW1+zIwIVv2sdf8Kp0t55bxmlj O6+p9EuIHzDQeOxsBq73ZXFoLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXf4aN7gKCGZYXPOoqVI1aLeO650Z1tn89qTbHzCNLC55N0Ab6rAbplKt8XgQAxTgA+V7Dkw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4282:: with SMTP id k2mr3727602wrq.196.1592568669243; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2a01:4b00:8523:2d03:d994:d48b:4a9:7c2b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm6886721wrq.15.2020.06.19.05.11.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:11:06 +0100 From: David Brazdil To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, android-kvm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/15] arm64: kvm: Add build rules for separate nVHE object files Message-ID: <20200619121106.sz5qxxkb53ida5qa@google.com> References: <20200618122537.9625-1-dbrazdil@google.com> <20200618122537.9625-4-dbrazdil@google.com> <09976ea31931481f4e00d627dc5e06fe@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09976ea31931481f4e00d627dc5e06fe@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey Marc, > I guess that one of the first use of this __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ > flag could be the has_vhe() predicate: if you're running the nVHE > code, you are *guaranteed* not to use VHE at all. Sure, I'll add that to the next respin. If I'm reading __is_defined correctly, it means I have to define the flag as =1. Easy. Thanks, -David