mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Martin Molnar <martin.molnar.programming@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix undefined operation VMXOFF during reboot and crash
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:06:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200625060639.GB2141@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611194817.2303-1-dpreed@deepplum.com>

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:48:18PM -0400, David P. Reed wrote:
> -/** Disable VMX on the current CPU
> +/* Disable VMX on the current CPU
>   *
> - * vmxoff causes a undefined-opcode exception if vmxon was not run
> - * on the CPU previously. Only call this function if you know VMX
> - * is enabled.
> + * vmxoff causes an undefined-opcode exception if vmxon was not run
> + * on the CPU previously. Only call this function directly if you know VMX
> + * is enabled *and* CPU is in VMX root operation.
>   */
>  static inline void cpu_vmxoff(void)
>  {
> -	asm volatile ("vmxoff");
> +	asm volatile ("vmxoff" ::: "cc", "memory"); /* clears all flags on success */
>  	cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_VMXE);
>  }
>  
> @@ -47,17 +47,35 @@ static inline int cpu_vmx_enabled(void)
>  	return __read_cr4() & X86_CR4_VMXE;
>  }
>  
> -/** Disable VMX if it is enabled on the current CPU
> - *
> - * You shouldn't call this if cpu_has_vmx() returns 0.
> +/*
> + * Safely disable VMX root operation if active
> + * Note that if CPU is not in VMX root operation this
> + * VMXOFF will fault an undefined operation fault,
> + * so use the exception masking facility to handle that RARE
> + * case.
> + * You shouldn't call this directly if cpu_has_vmx() returns 0
> + */
> +static inline void cpu_vmxoff_safe(void)
> +{
> +       asm volatile("1:vmxoff\n\t" /* clears all flags on success */

Eh, I wouldn't bother with the comment, there are a million other caveats
with VMXOFF that are far more interesting.

> +		    "2:\n\t"
> +                    _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)
> +                    ::: "cc",  "memory");

Adding the memory and flags clobber should be a separate patch.

> +       cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_VMXE);
> +}


I don't see any value in safe/unsafe variants.  The only in-kernel user of
VMXOFF outside of the emergency flows is KVM, which has its own VMXOFF
helper, i.e. all users of cpu_vmxoff() want the "safe" variant.  Just add
the exception fixup to cpu_vmxoff() and call it good.

> +
> +/*
> + * Force disable VMX if it is enabled on the current CPU,
> + * when it is unknown whether CPU is in VMX operation.
>   */
>  static inline void __cpu_emergency_vmxoff(void)
>  {
> -	if (cpu_vmx_enabled())
> -		cpu_vmxoff();
> +	if (!cpu_vmx_enabled())
> +		return;
> +	cpu_vmxoff_safe();

Unnecessary churn.

>  }
>  
> -/** Disable VMX if it is supported and enabled on the current CPU
> +/* Force disable VMX if it is supported on current CPU
>   */
>  static inline void cpu_emergency_vmxoff(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> index e040ba6be27b..b0e6b106a67e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -540,21 +540,14 @@ static void emergency_vmx_disable_all(void)
>  	 *
>  	 * For safety, we will avoid running the nmi_shootdown_cpus()
>  	 * stuff unnecessarily, but we don't have a way to check
> -	 * if other CPUs have VMX enabled. So we will call it only if the
> -	 * CPU we are running on has VMX enabled.
> -	 *
> -	 * We will miss cases where VMX is not enabled on all CPUs. This
> -	 * shouldn't do much harm because KVM always enable VMX on all
> -	 * CPUs anyway. But we can miss it on the small window where KVM
> -	 * is still enabling VMX.
> +	 * if other CPUs have VMX enabled.
>  	 */
> -	if (cpu_has_vmx() && cpu_vmx_enabled()) {
> +	if (cpu_has_vmx()) {
>  		/* Disable VMX on this CPU. */
> -		cpu_vmxoff();
> +		cpu_emergency_vmxoff();

This also needs to be in a separate patch.  And it should use
__cpu_emergency_vmxoff() instead of cpu_emergency_vmxoff().

>  
>  		/* Halt and disable VMX on the other CPUs */
>  		nmi_shootdown_cpus(vmxoff_nmi);
> -
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-25  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 18:12 [PATCH] " David P. Reed
2020-06-10 19:36 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-06-10 21:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-10 21:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-10 22:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-10 21:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-10 21:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-11  0:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-11  0:15     ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found]       ` <1591893200.58634165@apps.rackspace.com>
2020-06-11 17:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-11 17:02           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-11 19:45             ` [PATCH v2] " David P. Reed
2020-06-11 19:48             ` David P. Reed
2020-06-25  6:06               ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-06-25 14:45 David P. Reed
2020-06-25 14:59 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-29 20:54   ` David P. Reed
2020-06-29 21:22     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-29 21:49       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-29 22:46         ` David P. Reed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200625060639.GB2141@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=info@metux.net \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.molnar.programming@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome