From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60636C433DF for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328AD20768 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:34:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593146045; bh=svauuLOObuPPRRg/SNwuiGDY0wtaQA/mHRhvgoFOKLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=fHz2jFv2hUYbb4lgqmwV5wdxNUSTDXxsPDemga97Jb78JZ4OJkrw7w1bqtNYfE1XT W4uKf1eW5XKtLhVMBtZkOb13WoHf6AL2D65uDfH/xU1nnTQku8034P15ynPwe5DJ2M MZfmFV4rXiBlGV2rWq2GW8XA+2ovNe12UTsYuYFs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726905AbgFZEeB (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:34:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37198 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726607AbgFZEeB (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:34:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 602FC2075D; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593146041; bh=svauuLOObuPPRRg/SNwuiGDY0wtaQA/mHRhvgoFOKLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yje6TbSdOU9d3eYg1RxErX/cH/mrH1Xn5Qm/upujSxgmAUUTznxihaMEj6H4Ppzh3 iQ64GQMpErQJgW5XFLC5zOql6GAMEf6nvDrEY7MqjAWyQg76d2Nbhmu7U9T4FA1k24 h4Da8/XcXwLO98lMmxJcbEs7VmnMr5lf9H/z244Y= Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:33:58 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Collabora Kernel ML , groeck@chromium.org, Benson Leung , Dmitry Torokhov , Gwendal Grignou , Andy Shevchenko , Benjamin Tissoires , Bernardo Perez Priego , Daniel Campello , Enrico Granata , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Jonathan Cameron , Lee Jones , Nick Crews , Pi-Hsun Shih , Stephen Boyd , Wen Yang , Yicheng Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/chrome: Clarify SPDX license with GPL-2.0-only Message-ID: <20200626043358.GB175080@kroah.com> References: <20200625170356.225136-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:06:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:25 PM Enric Balletbo i Serra > wrote: > > > > Remove the ambiguity with GPL-2.0 and use an explicit GPL-2.0-only > > tag. > > Is there any? Last time IIRC Greg told me that in the kernel the old > and new variants are okay. They are just fine, leave it alone, the in-kernel LICENSES/ files show the valid SPDX tags that the kernel allows at this point in time. This is not worth the churn at all, once we get to complete coverage of all kernel files, then you can worry about trivial things like this. thanks, greg k-h