From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 02/11] drm/vblank: Use spin_(un)lock_irq() in drm_crtc_vblank_off()
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 22:47:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626204713.GG3278063@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624230318.126256-3-lyude@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:03:09PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This got me confused for a bit while looking over this code: I had been
> planning on adding some blocking function calls into this function, but
> seeing the irqsave/irqrestore variants of spin_(un)lock() didn't make it
> very clear whether or not that would actually be safe.
>
> So I went ahead and reviewed every single driver in the kernel that uses
> this function, and they all fall into three categories:
>
> * Driver probe code
> * ->atomic_disable() callbacks
> * Legacy modesetting callbacks
>
> All of these will be guaranteed to have IRQs enabled, which means it's
> perfectly safe to block here. Just to make things a little less
> confusing to others in the future, let's switch over to
> spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() to make that fact a little more
> obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
I think the patch is correct, but now we're having a bit a inconsistency,
since all other functions where the same applies still use _irqsave. I
looked through the file and I think drm_vblank_get, drm_crtc_vblank_reset,
drm_crtc_vblank_on and drm_legacy_vblank_post_modeset,
drm_queue_vblank_event and drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl are all candiates
for the same cleanup.
Maybe follow up patches for less confusion?
On this:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> index ce5c1e1d29963..e895f5331fdb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> @@ -1283,13 +1283,12 @@ void drm_crtc_vblank_off(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e, *t;
>
> ktime_t now;
> - unsigned long irqflags;
> u64 seq;
>
> if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
> return;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, irqflags);
> + spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
>
> spin_lock(&dev->vbl_lock);
> drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc %d, vblank enabled %d, inmodeset %d\n",
> @@ -1325,7 +1324,7 @@ void drm_crtc_vblank_off(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> drm_vblank_put(dev, pipe);
> send_vblank_event(dev, e, seq, now);
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, irqflags);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
>
> /* Will be reset by the modeset helpers when re-enabling the crtc by
> * calling drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). */
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200624230318.126256-1-lyude@redhat.com>
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 01/11] drm/vblank: Register drmm cleanup action once per drm_vblank_crtc Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 02/11] drm/vblank: Use spin_(un)lock_irq() in drm_crtc_vblank_off() Lyude Paul
2020-06-26 20:47 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 03/11] drm/vblank: Add vblank works Lyude Paul
2020-06-26 21:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 04/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Unroll error cleanup in nv50_head_create() Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 05/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv140-: Don't modify depth in state during atomic commit Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 06/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Fix disabling dithering Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 07/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: s/harm/armh/g Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 08/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv140-: Track wndw mappings in nv50_head_atom Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 09/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Expose nv50_outp_atom in disp.h Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 10/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Move hard-coded object handles into header Lyude Paul
2020-06-24 23:03 ` [RFC v7 11/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support Lyude Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200626204713.GG3278063@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®