From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7DAC433DF for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 05:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF52D207E8 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 05:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726016AbgF1Fw1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 01:52:27 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147]:37248 "EHLO nautica.notk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725913AbgF1Fw0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jun 2020 01:52:26 -0400 Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7F3F9C01A; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 07:52:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 07:52:10 +0200 From: Dominique Martinet To: Jianyong Wu Cc: ericvh@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve.Capper@arm.com, Kaly.Xin@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, wei.chen@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] 9p: remove unused code in 9p Message-ID: <20200628055210.GA13335@nautica> References: <20200628020608.36512-1-jianyong.wu@arm.com> <20200628020608.36512-3-jianyong.wu@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200628020608.36512-3-jianyong.wu@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jianyong Wu wrote on Sun, Jun 28, 2020: > These code has been commented out since 2007 and lied in kernel > since then. it's time to remove thest no used code. Good point, happy to take this - please resend without RFC separately (the two commits aren't related) after fixing the commit message (lie/lay is complicated and I'm not sure what should be used there but lied definitely isn't correct, the qualification doesn't really matter though so probably simpler to remove; and 'thest no used code' does not parse) -- Dominique