From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8EDC433E2 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC08821D81 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727057AbgF2Sg7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:36:59 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:46808 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726087AbgF2Sg4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:36:56 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 959E92B7; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:36:54 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Alexander A. Klimov" Cc: mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, robh@kernel.org, j.neuschaefer@gmx.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: Documentation/arm Message-ID: <20200629123654.1d1b62ce@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20200626194408.61245-1-grandmaster@al2klimov.de> <20200626150911.3d4f9ca7@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:10:58 +0200 "Alexander A. Klimov" wrote: > You know what: I totally agree with you! They are actively harmful and > shall not be there. End of story. > > But *why* you don't let me work step-by-step and *focus on one task* at > a time? Nobody is preventing you from doing that. But this work *does* require corresponding work from me and others, so I don't think it's inappropriate to say that there are other, related projects that, in my mind, have a rather higher priority. Thanks, jon