From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6A9C433DF for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8124420771 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:32:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593531146; bh=X9DhlaL3h3M6dHLQYSpCp1s//BjVGMTXEFW1olrYlVY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ndvhnY6y/9gSLHAXV8RgdTCBBhn8wuTS/M8eW9rCHDyL5I2OGeU2yf8404Is7i7ld CyMgF0ommKLP60BePMNVePpyTE/moCxyr+fIPgCX+AcDYdnrbkOtPJ1vQEL34RK6JL ckdgLX6fUH3D8C4W3cD8vWiehS0LVD+qfDiB14/I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389534AbgF3PcZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:32:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60314 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389467AbgF3PcX (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:32:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72B5D20760; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:32:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593531143; bh=X9DhlaL3h3M6dHLQYSpCp1s//BjVGMTXEFW1olrYlVY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cGmgcwpjkbNw52cCa7kRC/GPrkFsOqVEstQkyXvVZSV5xfX3TDwLBGaCURvEU0t5J 025muooT8Nw9JkjVoawTY13UY5CS39I1DCSxV8E++nanIFjyfYf2b5mkS5P4oQgLsh spZcFcj44mNzi0dHHjyA82NYyDTZtJ89hsbkAFBI= Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:32:20 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Sameer Pujar Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, digetx@gmail.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharadg@nvidia.com, mkumard@nvidia.com, viswanathl@nvidia.com, rlokhande@nvidia.com, dramesh@nvidia.com, atalambedu@nvidia.com, nwartikar@nvidia.com, swarren@nvidia.com, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 12/23] ASoC: simple-card: Support DPCM DAI link with multiple Codecs Message-ID: <20200630153220.GL5272@sirena.org.uk> References: <1593233625-14961-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> <1593233625-14961-13-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> <874kqu1x70.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <1e0cf6d1-bf4e-8808-5390-c8a3b7c7fe7e@nvidia.com> <87mu4lz6pt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <1d7888c7-a8cc-e891-01aa-016e31cc9113@nvidia.com> <87ftadyrec.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <492079e9-4518-78ba-a227-859d31594369@nvidia.com> <20200630110100.GH5272@sirena.org.uk> <81d106c0-e1c8-a79a-8caf-1f3be0d61f0c@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9/GiYV45wF7IL3Iq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81d106c0-e1c8-a79a-8caf-1f3be0d61f0c@nvidia.com> X-Cookie: Walk softly and carry a megawatt laser. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --9/GiYV45wF7IL3Iq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:23:49PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: > On 6/30/2020 4:31 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Why simple-card and not audio-graph-card? > Frankly speaking I have not used audio-graph-card before. I had a brief look > at the related binding. It seems it can use similar DT properties that > simple-card uses, although the binding style appears to be different. > However I am not sure if it offers better solutions to the problems I am > facing. For example, the ability to connect or form a chain of components to > realize more complicated use cases with DPCM, some of which were discussed > in [0]. Can you please help me understand why it could be preferred? > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/30/519 It's the more modern thing which covers everything simple-card does and more, I'd expect new development to go into that rather than simple-card. --9/GiYV45wF7IL3Iq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl77WwMACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BoOgf8CqlyK9s07Hb+/KSOYbf63ZpZ3dwuHoWv8+gtnKh+DZIH3KN07uHzVHXw q3NUE8wJkGfYijU49aUjB5lRw4KNjXtAUMUHNAKlzmjQM+cxlEj6nZOGWAFrHyYo 0rzPMLRbmsHTp9dcKdr7c/AXqYB8vgW+aYo6j76+W7fNvgW3thQllyW9ZKkvzQmz 7TePVknBmz5ov6rTQSau7p314ZBcJEYL74ANMr0LxKKe5TSv/xHLQM9WeEDdkMUE kELoYHwZrWvOFUfy1nCl+uPqvUr+ciJD5gW5+PQvKnV0nAaVA2jW0RE3KMWKRu/S PZJLfFNr7vFTIsIU0YMidjDYelIA0A== =8bSR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9/GiYV45wF7IL3Iq--