From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E03C433E1 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 07:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C3C2073E for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 07:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Boox+tm5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728470AbgGAH5Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 03:57:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728330AbgGAH5Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 03:57:24 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (mail-lj1-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61395C061755 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id h19so25791029ljg.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:57:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nppZMn8IG/x/P34XDI8YF5pOl6MlI1Bm1JmwS3tV0yQ=; b=Boox+tm54fOiXje1cmofks27n2hoUJw88n9u/2LWX5hJdcJ+OF6k+EH1ahpVpH8hD8 l5NVq0SCnbe9lZJKWbXYwV1+hx5foXPSbl+aGuuohkWDtvx/BBuXQCl0R4EjQTV6wc9X p8XWJfALmcucOvoVjiFK11m16U6t1ufvjBduiF7jscXrRUoZIudTB/qWHlp6W9zW+FoI xdu4Qyz+5aA/KGWScXwb5p6egeUCBrN4vjO/fXESjcXc/qfL7BlefEF3OjoBxSOhUTxa 2nFIbgsbQ4BLOMaB0/SGGT2dg6V/mJjNziOhlFNNjYJN+QJI6Ohu7sov9dBq8cOem4PP cBiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nppZMn8IG/x/P34XDI8YF5pOl6MlI1Bm1JmwS3tV0yQ=; b=RNpi/Xk/BpBxVpjHAWs0b8BjTftXFY81B6Gg6zzDkdLPZ2bM7T7uH2rNOwN8kzs2Fh U32Lj9+UKsJ5OlKyV92NYOM2GOm8W9G8X+6DjM6IPtWgb3jHAm9Pl/HkWNDiyC8csaP8 L7Hzj/iliVivh45yDQ8QYOoYTDjClrVTHboiBxb3GD+HSEFVTNGfjcj1t84FElAHZs22 X8bZEiztonLLJ4z/P0325dS+gHsKYZNH29eHQC8TBZDGEZvf8w7ZWUJJSMKYxH1snMnY 5z0urnptHx9Ds1gj9BKGywzFMZugSWd3X9vYQVH3oO+sjv513gmLpq0xbRZw32wnaWCU OhnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/dEz8wbm5OV6/yzJR8dwnWMFOZ5Sk6d/jdQJ/xKgaB2la1x2h oreg9r+DuK7Xi8w7QfgSRxCGxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBA7EZ9ifbC0OQDRGW5amYBrScua4tcV+VnmhMNzDwOw4Z+So/IRbP3OCKrea7bo9EmvuzpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b89:: with SMTP id z9mr12333738lji.163.1593590242821; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14sm1534598ljj.112.2020.07.01.00.57.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3D64101196; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:57:19 +0300 (+03) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:57:19 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: James Jones Cc: Ben Skeggs , Dave Airlie , Linus Torvalds , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , LKML Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 5.8-rc1 Message-ID: <20200701075719.p7h5zypdtlhqxtgv@box> References: <20200630230808.wj2xlt44vrszqfzx@box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:40:19PM -0700, James Jones wrote: > This implies something is trying to use one of the old > DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifiers with DRM-KMS without > first checking whether it is supported by the kernel. I had tried to force > an Xorg+Mesa stack without my userspace patches to hit this error when > testing, but must have missed some permutation. If the stalled Mesa patches > go in, this would stop happening of course, but those were held up for a > long time in review, and are now waiting on me to make some modifications. > > Are you using the modesetting driver in X? If so, with glamor I presume? Yes and yes. I attached Xorg.log. > What version of Mesa? 20.0.8 > Any distro patches? I don't see any. It's Gentoo. > Any non-default xorg.conf options that would affect modesetting, your X > driver if it isn't modesetting, or glamour? Modesetting without anything tricky. -- Kirill A. Shutemov