mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v11 6/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add perf notifications support
Date: Wed,  1 Jul 2020 16:53:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701155348.52864-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701155348.52864-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Make SCMI perf protocol register with the notification core.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
V10 --> V11
- removed likely/unlikely
- Ffix set_notify_enabled
V8 --> V9
- moved pr_info to pr_debug
- inlined MAP_EVT_TO_ENABLE_CMD
- use SCMI_PROTO_QUEUE_SZ
V6 --> V7
- fixed report.timestamp type
- fixed max_payld_sz initialization
- expose SCMI_EVENT_ in linux/scmi_protocol.h
V5 --> V6
- added handle argument to fill_custom_report()
V4 --> V5
- fixed unsual return construct
V3 --> V4
- scmi_event field renamed
V2 --> V3
- added handle awareness
V1 --> V2
- simplified .set_notify_enabled() implementation moving the ALL_SRCIDs
  logic out of protocol. ALL_SRCIDs logic is now in charge of the
  notification core, together with proper reference counting of enables
- switched to devres protocol-registration
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/scmi_protocol.h    |  17 ++++
 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index 7b8d7cebdac9..8bcad96e06ca 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -5,15 +5,19 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2018 ARM Ltd.
  */
 
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SCMI Notifications PERF - " fmt
+
 #include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
+#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
 #include <linux/sort.h>
 
 #include "common.h"
+#include "notify.h"
 
 enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd {
 	PERF_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3,
@@ -27,11 +31,6 @@ enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd {
 	PERF_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL = 0xb,
 };
 
-enum scmi_performance_protocol_notify {
-	PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED = 0x0,
-	PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED = 0x1,
-};
-
 struct scmi_opp {
 	u32 perf;
 	u32 power;
@@ -86,6 +85,19 @@ struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits {
 	__le32 notify_enable;
 };
 
+struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld {
+	__le32 agent_id;
+	__le32 domain_id;
+	__le32 range_max;
+	__le32 range_min;
+};
+
+struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld {
+	__le32 agent_id;
+	__le32 domain_id;
+	__le32 performance_level;
+};
+
 struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels {
 	__le16 num_returned;
 	__le16 num_remaining;
@@ -158,6 +170,11 @@ struct scmi_perf_info {
 	struct perf_dom_info *dom_info;
 };
 
+static enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd evt_2_cmd[] = {
+	PERF_NOTIFY_LIMITS,
+	PERF_NOTIFY_LEVEL,
+};
+
 static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
 				    struct scmi_perf_info *pi)
 {
@@ -488,6 +505,29 @@ static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
 	return scmi_perf_mb_level_get(handle, domain, level, poll);
 }
 
+static int scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					 u32 domain, int message_id,
+					 bool enable)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct scmi_xfer *t;
+	struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits *notify;
+
+	ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, message_id, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF,
+				 sizeof(*notify), 0, &t);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	notify = t->tx.buf;
+	notify->domain = cpu_to_le32(domain);
+	notify->notify_enable = enable ? cpu_to_le32(BIT(0)) : 0;
+
+	ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+
+	scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static bool scmi_perf_fc_size_is_valid(u32 msg, u32 size)
 {
 	if ((msg == PERF_LEVEL_GET || msg == PERF_LEVEL_SET) && size == 4)
@@ -722,6 +762,89 @@ static struct scmi_perf_ops perf_ops = {
 	.fast_switch_possible = scmi_fast_switch_possible,
 };
 
+static int scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable)
+{
+	int ret, cmd_id;
+
+	if (evt_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(evt_2_cmd))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	cmd_id = evt_2_cmd[evt_id];
+	ret = scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(handle, src_id, cmd_id, enable);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_debug("FAIL_ENABLED - evt[%X] dom[%d] - ret:%d\n",
+			 evt_id, src_id, ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void *scmi_perf_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+					  u8 evt_id, u64 timestamp,
+					  const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
+					  void *report, u32 *src_id)
+{
+	void *rep = NULL;
+
+	switch (evt_id) {
+	case SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED:
+	{
+		const struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld *p = payld;
+		struct scmi_perf_limits_report *r = report;
+
+		if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+			break;
+
+		r->timestamp = timestamp;
+		r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+		r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id);
+		r->range_max = le32_to_cpu(p->range_max);
+		r->range_min = le32_to_cpu(p->range_min);
+		*src_id = r->domain_id;
+		rep = r;
+		break;
+	}
+	case SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED:
+	{
+		const struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld *p = payld;
+		struct scmi_perf_level_report *r = report;
+
+		if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+			break;
+
+		r->timestamp = timestamp;
+		r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+		r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id);
+		r->performance_level = le32_to_cpu(p->performance_level);
+		*src_id = r->domain_id;
+		rep = r;
+		break;
+	}
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return rep;
+}
+
+static const struct scmi_event perf_events[] = {
+	{
+		.id = SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED,
+		.max_payld_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld),
+		.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_limits_report),
+	},
+	{
+		.id = SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED,
+		.max_payld_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld),
+		.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_level_report),
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct scmi_event_ops perf_event_ops = {
+	.set_notify_enabled = scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled,
+	.fill_custom_report = scmi_perf_fill_custom_report,
+};
+
 static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
 {
 	int domain;
@@ -754,6 +877,12 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
 			scmi_perf_domain_init_fc(handle, domain, &dom->fc_info);
 	}
 
+	scmi_register_protocol_events(handle,
+				      SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, SCMI_PROTO_QUEUE_SZ,
+				      &perf_event_ops, perf_events,
+				      ARRAY_SIZE(perf_events),
+				      pinfo->num_domains);
+
 	pinfo->version = version;
 	handle->perf_ops = &perf_ops;
 	handle->perf_priv = pinfo;
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 81dc3b132fda..65ad83ddde70 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ void scmi_protocol_unregister(int protocol_id);
 /* SCMI Notification API - Custom Event Reports */
 enum scmi_notification_events {
 	SCMI_EVENT_POWER_STATE_CHANGED = 0x0,
+	SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED = 0x0,
+	SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED = 0x1,
 };
 
 struct scmi_power_state_changed_report {
@@ -387,4 +389,19 @@ struct scmi_power_state_changed_report {
 	u32 power_state;
 };
 
+struct scmi_perf_limits_report {
+	u64 timestamp;
+	u32 agent_id;
+	u32 domain_id;
+	u32 range_max;
+	u32 range_min;
+};
+
+struct scmi_perf_level_report {
+	u64 timestamp;
+	u32 agent_id;
+	u32 domain_id;
+	u32 performance_level;
+};
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_SCMI_PROTOCOL_H */
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 22:03 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix SCMI Generic Power Domain probing Cristian Marussi
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-01 15:53   ` [PATCH v11 0/9] SCMI Notifications Core Support Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 1/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 2/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 4/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 5/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add power notifications support Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add sensor " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add reset " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53     ` [PATCH v11 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add base " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-03 14:49     ` [PATCH v11 0/9] SCMI Notifications Core Support Sudeep Holla
2020-06-17  9:43       ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add fast_switch_possible() api Nicola Mazzucato
2020-06-17  9:43         ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: arm_scmi: Set fast_switch_possible conditionally Nicola Mazzucato
2020-06-17 12:47           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-18  6:14             ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-18  8:08               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-18  9:54           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-03 14:49         ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add fast_switch_possible() api Sudeep Holla
2020-06-25 10:19           ` [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FW Sudeep Holla
2020-07-03 14:49             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-09 13:45               ` [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Use signed integer to report transfer status Sudeep Holla
2020-06-09 14:00                 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-07-03 14:49                 ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701155348.52864-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®