From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F415BC433DF for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39F320708 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726975AbgGINJ2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:09:28 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:35643 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726358AbgGINJ2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:09:28 -0400 Received: from ip5f5af08c.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.240.140] helo=wittgenstein) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtWIm-0001QU-LZ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 13:09:24 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:09:24 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Joel Fernandes Cc: Greg KH , Suren Baghdasaryan , Hridya Valsaraju , Todd Kjos , Christian Brauner , Arve =?utf-8?B?SGrDuG5uZXbDpWc=?= , Martijn Coenen , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: add Hridya and myself into Android driver maintainers list Message-ID: <20200709130924.alkcskho5miybvd2@wittgenstein> References: <20200708231253.3831497-1-surenb@google.com> <20200709081820.GB13487@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:18 AM Greg KH wrote: > > And I thought we were deleting ashmem soon? > > This seems harder than initially thought. The Android userspace is > intertwined with ashmem in various ways (security policies, apps etc). > There were various concerns with old apps using /dev/ashmem directly > without going through library layers and that such apps could not be > upgraded. Various approaches were tried to work around this by > different folks to varying degrees of effect. Also, I am no longer > with the Android team at Google, but I continue to work with them > upstream. > > Fwiw, I will continue reviewing this and other Android code from my > side. Thanks. Same.